Your “criticism” is not valid because they can tell by another Australopithecus afarensis skull (AL 444-2) that Lucy was bipedal plus Australopithecus afarensis bipedality is dramatically confirmed by a set of footprints discovered in fossilized ash.
You really should do some independent research instead of relying on your creationist talking point.
The "talking points" were from Evos, not Creas; nice try.
Your “criticism” is not valid because they can tell by another Australopithecus afarensis skull (AL 444-2) that Lucy was bipedal plus Australopithecus afarensis bipedality is dramatically confirmed by a set of footprints discovered in fossilized ash.
Put against the evidence that the Evos I presented,your evidence does not take anything away from, nor comes close to, the irrefutable truth that Lucy should not be used as evidence of Evolution. Again; nice try.
Obviously you are not worth debating, you do not believe anything, let alone entertain any notion, that goes against your world veiw.