[celmak]

The only facts that have been "brought to me" are the facts against it. I don't have enough information to make an assesment of Lucy based on that, but I do have enough to make an assesment of the objectivity of your arguments.

Then you do not think one way or the other if Lucy should be part of the evidence of Evolution. Fair enough; if only Evo's really believed this.

[tacticalogic]

Then you do not think one way or the other if Lucy should be part of the evidence of Evolution. Fair enough; if only Evo's really believed this.

I know the Theory of Evolution predates the discovery of that particular artifact, so the theory itself is not going to fall on the exclusion that evidence. Beyond that, I don't see the significance of Lucy walking upright or not as being a boolean indicator of evolution in general.