[Marie]

"If Uncle Bill wants to debate, here are a few points he will have a tough time responding to: Stupak amounts to nothing less than an unacceptable 'middle-class abortion ban, If this bill becomes law, millions of middle class women will be prohibited from buying, through the exchange, private insurance that covers abortion, a legal medical procedure."

So abortion should be covered because simply because it's legal?

OK, let's look at a few other things that used to be legal:

- slavery
- prohibiting women from voting
- it was legal for men to beat their wives

Legal does equate to *right*.

I'm not paying for another's immoral act.

"Members of Congress have been saying in public interviews that they didn't realize the impact of Stupak before they voted for this proposal. Now that they have come to fully appreciate the impact of the Stupak ban, they are indicating that Stupak went to far,"

So you're admitting that our government officials are uninformed, rushed and not qualified to write health care policy? Perhaps, if they don't know what they're doing, they shouldn't be doing it.

In our house, it wouldn't be Uncle Bill or Aunt Gladys arguing the pro-life points. It would be my 17 year-old daughter pounding the table, snarling about the sacrifice of women on the alter of Feminism and the Abortion Agenda and declaring (with flashing eyes) WAR on perpetrators of the "unethical extermination of *my* generation"...

She's quite a pistol. :-)

[wagglebee]

In our house, it wouldn't be Uncle Bill or Aunt Gladys arguing the pro-life points. It would be my 17 year-old daughter pounding the table, snarling about the sacrifice of women on the alter of Feminism and the Abortion Agenda and declaring (with flashing eyes) WAR on perpetrators of the "unethical extermination of *my* generation"...

I think that young people are more aware than most of us realize that a third of their generation has been systematically exterminated in the pursuit of "choice and convenience".