Posted on 11/25/2009 2:40:13 PM PST by Syncro
MSNBC EXCLUSIVE: FORT HOOD NEVER HAPPENED!
November 25, 2009
It's been weeks since eyewitnesses reported that Maj. Nidal Hasan shouted "Allahu akbar" before spraying Fort Hood with gunfire, killing 13 people.
Since then we also learned that Hasan gave a medical lecture on beheading infidels and pouring burning oil down their throats (unfortunately not covered under the Senate health care bill). Some wondered if perhaps a pattern was beginning to emerge but were promptly dismissed as racist cranks.
We also found out Hasan had business cards printed up with the jihadist abbreviation "SOA" for "Soldier of Allah." Was that enough to conclude that the shooting was an act of terrorism -- or does somebody around here need to take another cultural sensitivity class?
And we know that Hasan had contacted several jihadist Web sites and that he had been exchanging e-mails with a radical Islamic cleric in Yemen. The FBI learned that last December, but the rest of us only found out about it a week ago.
Is it still too soon to come to the conclusion that the Fort Hood shooting was an act of terrorism?
Alas, it is still too early to tell at MSNBC. For Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews -- at least two of whom would be severely punished under Shariah law -- the shooting of George Tiller was an act of terrorism, no question. The death of a census taker in Kentucky was also an act of terrorism. (We learned this week that it was a suicide/insurance scam.) But as to Maj. Hasan, the jury is still out -- and will be out for many, many years.
Actually, according to Keith, the Fort Hood massacre may not have happened at all. He has argued persuasively, on several occasions, that it is impossible, literally impossible, to commit mass murder at a military base.
Like many on the left, Keith loved to sneer at all terrorist plots allegedly foiled by the Bush administration. He was particularly contemptuous of the purported plan of six aspiring jihadists to sneak onto the Fort Dix army base and kill as many soldiers as they could.
On Nov. 11, 2008, he explained why the Fort Dix terrorist plot was a laughable fraud, saying the "morons" apparently didn't realize that "all the soldiers have these big guns."
Keith, the moron, apparently doesn't realize that on military bases on U.S. soil only MPs have guns. (Special authorization is required for soldiers to carry a firearm, which can be granted only in the case of a specific and credible threat against military personnel in that region. Thank you, Bill Clinton.)
Again on May 21 this year, Olbermann ridiculed the Fort Dix terror plot, pointing out that the six alleged terrorists seemed to be "forgetting that every man there was armed." (Curiously, even though ROTC was offered at the ag school Keith attended, he appears not to have investigated it.)
But it was not until Aug. 21 of this year that Olbermann hit upon the true reason for the Bush administration's hyping of this implausible terror plot. According to Keith -- and I'm not kidding -- it was to distract from Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' announcement that her state had been unable to respond adequately to a tornado because Bush had diverted the National Guard to his crazy war in Iraq!
Read more at AnnCoulter.Com
:o)
LOLOLOL
Whoopie will undoubtedly tell us that if we insist on calling it "murder", at least it wasn't "murder-murder".
Gotcha. . .and all those civilians shot dead or wounded, didn’t count?
Fact is, he chose the one place where there would be soldiers AND civilians present.
Terrorism. . .and terrorism can also count as treason.
It was an act of terrorism and an act of war.
Preformed by an Islamic terrorist, in our military protected by the dangerous leftist practice of political correctness
Leaving you asking the question; just another example of Ann's talent.
Hey Keith, isn't Pearl Harbor a military base?
I think that tingle was Olbermans tongue.
I had the same misperception. Though, unlike this idiot, I didn't see stateside soldiers in the mess with SAMS slung over their shoulders. I did have an image of officers with sidearms.
So after Ft. Hood I wondered about it, and came to FR and asked in a vanity post why nobody was armed. Then I was informed. Maybe if Keith did his show prep here, he wouldn't be quite so unformed. But with him, it isn't so much about simple ignorance (thought there's plenty of that). Olbermann is s terrorist sympathizer. He spent the entire Bush administration scoffing at every single terror bust, and sticking up for the poor little jihadists, that were:
-completely incompetent and really no threat at all
-simply misunderstood,
-victims of the dastardly bush propaganda machine
I can no longer stomach more of this guy than about 2 minutes a month. Did any brave person ever hear his moronic take on how something like Ft. Hood could happen in the new utopia, and how it was Bush's, Palin's and O'Reilly's fault?
They need to make "I Wanna Be Sedated" by the Ramones the theme song
at MSNBC for Olbermann, Matthews & Co. Along with a couple of guys
in white coats and a LARGE butterfly net...
Gotta love Ann's throw-away side shots.
Why not all three?
Maybe Ann knows something we don’t. ;)
I haven’t thought of the Ramones in a long time.
Keith Olberman is obsessed with soldier’s “big guns” but not, apparently, their rifles.
Ann was on with Miller for A FULL HOUR!
I’m not sure what that means?
Keith looks like he should know. Here.
Oh, a mosh pit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.