Skip to comments.
University of East Anglia Statements
University of East Anglia website ^
| Nov. 24, 2009
| Professor Trevor Davies
Posted on 11/24/2009 9:09:51 PM PST by 4horses+amule
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
To: ScottinVA
>> This is very reminiscent of CBS spin <<
Hmm. Fake but accurate?
Where have we heard that before?
81
posted on
11/25/2009 9:09:41 AM PST
by
Hawthorn
To: 4horses+amule
Rush is covering this right now.
82
posted on
11/25/2009 9:12:33 AM PST
by
opentalk
To: gibtx2
They took the ACORN sound track.
You don't control the media sir...sadly out of date.
83
posted on
11/25/2009 9:30:13 AM PST
by
colonialhk
(Elect Veterans not Lawyers)
To: All
“Easy Bake Oven”
Is Begley out of his mind?
84
posted on
11/25/2009 9:30:48 AM PST
by
Rodney Dangerfield
(The MSM isn't AWOL, they are complicit enablers that know exactly what they are doing.)
To: colonialhk
they do control the media ...... they control the universities... and some big companies like GE.... they control the government... get up to date.. they do control and while you at it check out Ciscos ; Earth Skin project; Their future plan to control ever thing through green.
85
posted on
11/25/2009 10:28:34 AM PST
by
gibtx2
(End Tenure)
To: torchthemummy
How much electricity is used for gaming anyway?
How much electricity could be saved by banishing WoW for example?
Or iPods, iTunes, Xbox, whatever.
Spread the rumor and start counting the new young “converts” to good science.
86
posted on
11/25/2009 12:15:45 PM PST
by
getitright
(Are you hoping to change back yet?)
To: Reverend Wright
I fear that this is closer to the truth than not. World domination is undoubtedly the goal of the GWA crowd. It is scarey how very close they are to achieving this goal. PRAY.
87
posted on
11/25/2009 1:27:12 PM PST
by
Josephat
To: Reverend Wright
Did you read the hypothetical email he posted in order for him to believe this is a sham?
Here’s his conclusion:
“The hacked emails are a hard knock, but the science of global warming withstands much more than that.”
Whatever. The New Flat Earth Society will not go away quietly.
88
posted on
11/25/2009 2:16:40 PM PST
by
CommieCutter
("You wanted the presidency, you got it, now FIX THE DAMN ECONOMY!!!!" ----YankeeReb)
To: Anti-Bubba182
Begley, " Stu, listen to those with PHD's'.........
PHD aka Piled High and Deep
To: Anti-Bubba182
90
posted on
11/25/2009 4:47:07 PM PST
by
hyperconservative
(Heartfelt humble thanks to the Great Whistleblower(s) at CRU!!)
To: hyperconservative
Aren't these “warmers” too much. Anyone who ever set foot in college knows the type: smug, ego-centric, inconsiderate, intolerant. Their “research” often is never replicated by anyone. They are ideologues in the classroom. They get defensive when questioned about their beliefs. If you press them, you might even get an adjusted grade (downward). Really, they are insecure incompetents, hiding behind their tenure. These “scientists” (and I use that descriptor loosely on these bums) need investigated, charged with misusing grant monies...and if found guilty fined, fired and exposed for the frauds they are. This is beyond money issues, but also takes away from the ethical integrity of science. EVERY real scientist and professor need to speak out for open investigation and prosecution. Pox on these moral degenerates.
91
posted on
11/25/2009 8:35:35 PM PST
by
hal ogen
To: 4horses+amule
CRUs peer-reviewed publications are consistent with, and have contributed to, the overwhelming scientific consensus that the climate is being strongly influenced by human activity Main Entry: con·sen·sus
Pronunciation: \kÉn-Ësen(t)-sÉs\
Function: noun
Usage: often attributive
Etymology: Latin, from consentire
Date: 1843
1 a : general agreement : unanimity
b : the judgment arrived at by most of those concerned (the consensus was to go ahead)
2 : group solidarity in sentiment and belief
Here's the gotcha, CONSENSUS does not mean proof only the there was an agreement among a group to agree. I'm sure the Nazis had a consensus about ethnicity and the KKK a consensus about race but in no way does consensus imply truth or proof.
92
posted on
11/25/2009 8:49:43 PM PST
by
this_ol_patriot
(I saw manbearpig and all I got was this lousy tagline.)
To: Reverend Wright
George Moonbat? Did you read the satire he posted after supposedly admitting there's a problem?
I believe his "admission" was strictly tongue in cheek.
He thinks this is entertaining, and that he is above reproach.
93
posted on
11/25/2009 9:22:26 PM PST
by
4woodenboats
(B0-"There'll be no shooting of out of uniform enemies" RR-"The Bombing Will Begin In 5 Minutes")
To: 4woodenboats
94
posted on
11/25/2009 9:42:45 PM PST
by
HTuttle
To: torchthemummy
...put out a rumor that Dems are planning to drastically restrict cell phone usage to minimalist levels in the name of saving the planet.I think they are already trying to damage the cell phone industry with the whole brain tumor thing.
95
posted on
11/26/2009 12:01:00 AM PST
by
ponygirl
To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Mr. Begley’s religion has just been debunked, so it’s understandable that he would flip out like he has. What belief will he cling to now?
96
posted on
11/26/2009 12:05:38 AM PST
by
ponygirl
To: Rodney Dangerfield
Is Begley out of his mind?Um, yes.
97
posted on
11/26/2009 12:08:46 AM PST
by
ponygirl
To: ponygirl
You see, it’s this way:
the whole thing is the fault of Sarah Palin and George Bush.
PROBLEM SOLVED!
98
posted on
11/26/2009 10:37:05 AM PST
by
Radagast the Fool
("Mexico-Beirut with tacos!"--Dr. Zoidberg)
To: 4horses+amule
In essence they are saying their own emails are BS. What then should we make of their “science”—???
Funny. “Climatologist” seesm to be code speak for “total liar.”
99
posted on
11/26/2009 1:33:03 PM PST
by
PaleoBob
To: 4horses+amule
"There is nothing in the stolen material which indicates that peer-reviewed publications by CRU, and others, on the nature of global warming and related climate change are not of the highest-quality of scientific investigation and interpretation." Like bl**dy h*ll there isn't. The comments and code showing that they substituted temperature measurements from weather stations for tree ring data when the actual tree ring data didn't support their pre-conceived notions are not scientific investigations of any quality, not interpretation, but outright fraud.
The fact that the temperature measurements and tree rings didn't correspond should, if these were honest scientists, have been the basis for reconsidering the use of tree growth ring data as a proxy for temperature at all.
100
posted on
11/26/2009 5:11:00 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson