Did I misquote you? Did you not ask why new life the size of a beagle isn't showing up every day? You waved away the point about viruses, and you seem to have missed the point about how any new life or pre-life would get eaten right away by existing life. If you don't want to talk about beagles, don't bring up beagles.
You did misunderstand initially, now you seem to have the idea that I presented because you have an answer.
What a huge assumption and leap of faith to state that ANY NEW LIFE OR PRE-LIFE (sic) WOULD GET EATEN RIGHT AWAY BY EXISTING LIFE
So, initially when there was absolutely no life...my original question...how did life begin? I am not trying to annoy you, simply trying to get what a concise thought on the matter is. I have never read nor heard of an answer to that question that is reasonable by any sense of logic and reason. BTW, life either is or isn’t...pre-life is no life. To my knowledge, there can be no in between.
Lastly, my point with the Beagle is why are there not large animals popping out? We truly now have a “soup” from which life may be created if the atheist view is to be accepted. There really is no reason to begin with a simple single cell organism is there? If so, why?
And, if you say that it has to be single cell...please prove it... :)
BTW, Ha Ha Thats Very Logical, thanks for debating with me.