Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox
I learned all I had to know about the so-called "women's movement" when I contrasted how they handled the sexual allegations made against Republican senator Bob Packwood and Democratic president Bill Clinton. In the former case, the Republican senator was run out of office, in the latter case, the women making the accusations were marginalized as "trailer-trash whores" and the Democratic president was not only given a free pass but given carte blanche to continue in his womanizing ways.

The women's movement is not about "women's rights" at all, but it is all about acquiring political power and they will cast any of their fellow women aside in order to obtain and retain it.

63 posted on 11/27/2009 10:08:13 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 29 days away from outliving Lefty Frizzell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
The women's movement is not about "women's rights" at all, but it is all about acquiring political power and they will cast any of their fellow women aside in order to obtain and retain it.

Bernard Nathanson, the abortion doctor-turned prolifer, was at the beginning of the abortion debate in 1973 and witnessed firsthand how the left allowed the women to take the lead, because the loud yapping those women provided were a great cover for the left to proceed in their leftward march. In other words, the left have always used women as a cover.

Men on the left love loud yapping women. They hate strong prolife women. They hate Sarah Palin and all women like her. For that reason conservative men should do the gentlemanly thing and stand up for Sarah. Only then will they secure their place as real men.

64 posted on 11/27/2009 10:52:41 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson