Lots of big words there. What is wrong with that first option? You seem to have a problem with the idea that we have a Creator? You rtheistic evolution is a crock.
Your theistic evolution is also misnamed, more properly, it is a-theistic. As it renders man as nothing more than an enormous ‘accident’ of nature. Hardly worthy of a theistic label at all.
Nothing at all. Actually, I am advocating it here. If you can't understand how an 'accidental' process can lead to order, then you have an easy option: just believe, without adding pseudo-science to the mix.