Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Star Traveler
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1806721/posts

"“What we now have is an out-and-out propaganda piece, in which there is not even a gesture toward balance or explanation of why many of the extended inferences drawn in the film are not widely accepted by the scientific community. There are so many examples, it's hard to know where to begin, so I will cite only one: a speaker asserts, as is true, that carbon dioxide is only a small fraction of the atmospheric mass. The viewer is left to infer that means it couldn't really matter. But even a beginning meteorology student could tell you that the relative masses of gases are irrelevant to their effects on radiative balance. A director not intending to produce pure propaganda would have tried to eliminate that piece of disinformation.” -- Carl Wunsch (http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/papersonline/responseto_channel4.htm)"

60 posted on 11/24/2009 8:31:20 PM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator
You were quoting that article posted by a FReeer (in 2007) and it said ...

The film's other scientific claims can be similarly dismissed. Carl Wunsch - who, as discussed, appeared in the film - comments:

“What we now have is an out-and-out propaganda piece, in which there is not even a gesture toward balance or explanation of why many of the extended inferences drawn in the film are not widely accepted by the scientific community. There are so many examples, it's hard to know where to begin, so I will cite only one: a speaker asserts, as is true, that carbon dioxide is only a small fraction of the atmospheric mass. The viewer is left to infer that means it couldn't really matter. But even a beginning meteorology student could tell you that the relative masses of gases are irrelevant to their effects on radiative balance. A director not intending to produce pure propaganda would have tried to eliminate that piece of disinformation.” (http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/ papersonline/channel4response)

LOL... that's like asking Satan why Jesus Christ is not the Savior...

Or, in context of this article, it's like asking those scientists whose e-mails were just exposed, why critics of Anthropogenic Global Warming are wrong. :-)

You're asking the fox to guard the henhouse (the henhouse of so-called scientific inquiry). I'm afraid the fox has already eaten the chickens and is getting ready to eat the rest of us... LOL...

65 posted on 11/25/2009 4:09:50 AM PST by Star Traveler (The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is a Zionist and Jerusalem is the apple of His eye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson