Let me just say what I did... I wrote a letter on the weekend to my Member of Parliament with a copy to the Prime Minister and the Environment Minister. Each will get it via email, fax and snail-mail. Believe it or not, I've already got back a response and reading between the lines, the message was this... "we got your message and you can support us by having absolutely everybody you know inundate us with that and similar messages. We are looking for cover and if there is a very high level of negative feedback that we receive about this issue, we will be that much stronger in taking and presenting that position." So there you have it....get busy!
[[”we got your message and you can support us by having absolutely everybody you know inundate us with that and similar messages. We are looking for cover and if there is a very high level of negative feedback that we receive about this issue, we will be that much stronger in taking and presenting that position.”]]
Well, that’s al lwell and swell, but WHY does it matter how many people support goign ahead with htis IF what they did was agaisnt hte law, or a giant scam perpetrated agaisnt hte people? That alone should be reason and power enough to proceed forth with investigations- it seems to me that the response is in essence “Yeah, we know what they did was illegal, but we’re waiting to see how many people really want us to prosecute before we do our job of protecting hte public from fraud and scam artists”
If I were you I’d write htem back and make this clear to them- ask them why it woudl take a consensus in order for them to do their jobs? That just proves they aren’t really itnerested in upholdign hte law, or in protecting the people, UNLESS it’s politcally expedient to do so- they htrow law out hte window in favor of political capitalism