To: JPG
Well, sure, shes a private citizen, but theyre not going into her house and telling her not to make a speech. Theyre telling her not to come into theirs and do it.
Simple fact: Follow the rules.
And Sarah Palin has no problem with it, so why should we?
9 posted on
11/23/2009 8:19:06 AM PST by
ketelone
To: ketelone
The Army, according to their COS, is more concerned with “diversity” than rooting out potential terrorists. See the MTP interview. Then the edict, which was overturned, to bar ANY press coverage of Palin’s visit. It is all BS PC, and the Army best get back up to speed on these issues;.
76 posted on
11/23/2009 8:58:01 AM PST by
JPG
(Obama's plan for America...today, Labor Unions...tomorrow, Labor Camps.)
To: ketelone
Simple fact: Follow the rules. But it was okay when The One did it in Iraq and Trashcanistan when he was campaigning for the election?
I have no problem if those are the rules, but why make an exception for Obama?
79 posted on
11/23/2009 8:58:36 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: ketelone
Simple. If an entertainer went to Ft. Bragg to entertain the troops, would they be ordered NOT TO SPEAK, TAKE PHOTOS, OR ANYTHING ELSE????
HELL NO!!!!!! This is coming from the Whitehouse. Something NEVER DONE BEFORE.
AS a former FT. Bragg soldier from the 519th MI BN, I’m FREAKING SICK OF THIS SHIT!!!!
I hope she gets up on stage and demands to see Usurper Obama’s birth certificate!
To: ketelone
And Sarah Palin has no problem with it, so why should we?
Could we know why and where these 'orders' come from!
To: ketelone
It is not “their” house, it is our house. 1A should apply.
155 posted on
11/23/2009 11:57:56 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(No Representation without Taxation!)
To: ketelone
It is not “their” house, it is our house. 1A should apply.
156 posted on
11/23/2009 11:58:04 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(No Representation without Taxation!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson