That is the story title, what they are admitting is subject to interpretation.
I haven’t read the article yet, but often times, ex-IPCC researchers are simply referred to as ‘IPCC researchers’ which is why I’m asking, because if they are ex-IPCC, then they will be accused by the IPCC of being ‘disgruntled ex employees’ who ‘have an ax to grind’- they’ll be marginalized by the Mainstream media- heck, even if they’re currently employed by the IPCC, they’ll be deemed as disgruntled and marginalized in the MSM I’m sure- and sadly, people will buy it.