Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft and News Corp eye web pact
Financial Times ^ | 11/22/2009 | Matthew Garrahan

Posted on 11/22/2009 5:59:24 PM PST by Daus

Microsoft and News Corp eye web pact

By Matthew Garrahan in Los Angeles, Richard Waters in San Francisco and Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson in New York

Published: November 22 2009 23:01 | Last updated: November 22 2009 23:01

Microsoft has had discussions with News Corp over a plan that would involve the media company’s being paid to “de-index” its news websites from Google, setting the scene for a search engine battle that could offer a ray of light to the newspaper industry.

The impetus for the discussions came from News Corp, owner of newspapers ranging from the Wall Street Journal of the US to The Sun of the UK, said a person familiar with the situation, who warned that talks were at an early stage.

However, the Financial Times has learnt that Microsoft has also approached other big online publishers to persuade them to remove their sites from Google’s search engine.

News Corp and Microsoft, which owns the rival Bing search engine, declined to comment.

One website publisher approached by Microsoft said that the plan “puts enormous value on content if search engines are prepared to pay us to index with them”.

Microsoft’s interest is being interpreted as a direct assault on Google because it puts pressure on the search engine to start paying for content.

“This is all about Microsoft hurting Google’s margins,” said the web publisher who is familiar with the plan.

But the biggest beneficiary of the tussle could be the newspaper industry, which has yet to construct a reliable online business model that adequately replaces declining print and advertising revenues.

In a possible sign of negotiations to come, Google last week played down the importance of newspaper content.

Matt Brittin, Google’s UK director, told a Society of Editors conference that Google did not need news content to survive. “Economically it’s not a big part of how we generate revenue,” he said.

News Corp has been exploring online payment models for its newspapers and has taken an increasingly hard line against Google.

Rupert Murdoch, News Corp chairman, has said that he would use legal methods to prevent Google “stealing stories” published in his papers.

Microsoft is desperate to catch Google in search and, after five years and hundreds of millions of dollars of losses, Bing, launched in June, marks its most ambitious attempt yet.

Steve Ballmer, chief executive of Microsoft, has said that the company is prepared to spend heavily for many years to make Bing a serious rival to Google.

Microsoft has sought to differentiate Bing by drawing in material not found elsewhere, though has not demanded exclusivity from content partners. Bing accounted for 9.9 per cent of searches in the US in October, up from 8.4 per cent at its launch, according to ComScore.

James Murdoch, chairman and chief executive of News Corp Europe and Asia, hinted last week that the company was making progress with its online plans. “We think that there’s a very exciting marketplace, potentially a wholesale market place for digital journalism that we’ll be developing,” he said



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
And thus, the next battle line is formed. This will be fascinating to see play out and one of the biggest stories of the coming year.
1 posted on 11/22/2009 5:59:25 PM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Daus

Yes! Yes! Yes!

Run for the hills you liberal cretins!


2 posted on 11/22/2009 6:06:52 PM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daus

Knowing M$’s modus operandi, this can only end badly...


3 posted on 11/22/2009 6:10:12 PM PST by pvoce ('Good' sense and 'Common' sense are two entirely different concepts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pvoce

Knowing that Prince al-Walid bin Talal owns a big chunk of news corp, this can only end badly...


4 posted on 11/22/2009 6:25:55 PM PST by null and void (We are now in day 305 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daus
I saw Murdock on TV proclaiming that in focus groups they'd learned that people were willing to pay for content, that people know that content isn't free.

Frankly, I see a disaster building, and as others have mentioned it will comprise a bid news story - but evidentally, one will have to pay to follow it.

YAWN

5 posted on 11/22/2009 6:42:07 PM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie

it’s not possible to sell news content on the web unless you are in a niche with access to the nerve center of that niche (e.g. Wall Street Journal). WSJ can charge for its website because its content is not only unique, it operates on a level of journalistic integrity far above other mainstream papers.

Look, the NY Times already figure out no one wants to pay to read their news. Why would anyone pay a monthly fee for, say, Chicago Tribune online? And what if other news entities followed suit? How many news sites will one person subscribe to?

The only way I can see a pay-for-content scheme is if Internet providers start offering packages like cable companies that you have to pay for to, say, get access to ESPN.com and Weather com, etc... Still, even that’s a non-starter.


6 posted on 11/22/2009 7:16:33 PM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Daus

Guess what? This has already happened.

For the past few months, I have been reading all the WSJ articles I want because of “deep linking,” where a Google search on a WSJ title would deliver the full, unabbreviated article. That stopped tonight.

So now I will go to Bloomberg for all of my hard news and miss out a few fluff pieces in the Journal. Hard news will always be provided, whether by Bloomberg, Thompson-Reuters, or AP. They already get a license fee from Google for their content. And WSJ editorials and columns will remain free.

My bet? WSJ will drive away any potential customers who might pay for something, but who feel totally excluded by the News Corp/Murdoch policies. There has been no successful example of a publication switching from free to paid (e.g., New York Times) and I predict that this ploy will fail as well. Sell News Corp!


7 posted on 11/22/2009 8:01:00 PM PST by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
it’s not possible to sell news content on the web unless you are in a niche with access to the nerve center of that niche

I think people are missing the point of this story. It's not a "pay for content" story... Microsoft is basically paying to get exclusive search content. Google's offering will become less rich because it wont have Murdoch content.

Too date, it's been a technology battle over who can search and present search results the best. But everyone had access to the same web to index. This would change that.
8 posted on 11/22/2009 8:02:57 PM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader
So now I will go to Bloomberg for all of my hard news

And when Bloomberg takes the money from Microsoft/Google? Then what? I understand there will be another smaller source to step in... probably. But what this will lead to is the sowing of doubt in everyones search results. Right now, if it was published, you believe you will find it in Google. That will no longer be true. How does that change everyone's behavior?

It's interesting. If this gets legs, sell Google and Microsoft IMO.
9 posted on 11/22/2009 8:10:46 PM PST by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson