Replies

Where do I even begin, you explained Evolution in 14 points, that's exactly what the problem with Evolution is. Darwinist's hide false theory inside of the true parts of Evolution, and then refer to everything as Evolution. Are there changes in species that are observable? Of course there are, does that have anything to do with all species from one origin or Human Evolution? Certainly not in any way! Bacteria and viruses adapt and change, but does that mean that everything behaves the same way as they, no! To think otherwise is insanity, unless one lumps all of Evolution into one big pile of confusion.

These Darwin scientists research one thing (bacteria) and say their conclusions show results that have nothing to do with what they researched in the first place (all species must behave this way). They do this by lumping everything under the umbrella of Evolution and it happens all the time in peer reviewed papers. It is not science. It's part science and part philosophy, which is only half science.

That’s what Evolution IS! If you have a problem with Evolution you have a problem with one or more of these fourteen points. Which one is it? Provide any evidence of any of the points that are incorrect

Evolution is everything and anything that evos want it to be defined as, that way it is everything and there is never going to be any way to disprove it.

The same goes for the elastic, universal term *species*. Label every little change in something as a new species, and viola’ evolution is observed, even if it has that complicating little factor of only variation within species and not actual macroevolution (for lack of a better term).

Somehow, evos never seem to get that the problem most people have with the TOE is not the concepts of natural selection and variation within species, but the major species to species changes that they extrapolate out of those observations.

It’s just beyond their comprehension that others don’t assume as much as they do.