Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman charged in Fort Hood-related hate crime: Pulling a headscarf
Christian Science Monitor ^ | November 20, 2009 | Patrik Jonsson

Posted on 11/21/2009 7:18:55 AM PST by george76

An Illinois woman is charged with a hate crime for berating a Muslim woman about the Fort Hood shooting and then pulling at her headscarf. The charge could lead to three years in prison: justice or prosecutorial overkill?

In the days after the Ft. Hood shooting, mosques around the country bolstered their security in anticipation of a backlash from Americans angry about a Muslim man alleged to have killed American soldiers on their own turf.

Since then, only one alleged hate crime against Muslims has been directly tied to the Fort Hood rampage.

Two days after the rampage by an alleged lone wolf jihadist killed 13 in Texas, a Tinley Park, Ill., woman grumbled about the massacre and tugged the headscarf of a US-born Muslim woman, Amal Abusumayah, standing in line at a local grocery store.

Reaction was swift and, as prosecutors announced this week, serious: The alleged scarf-puller, Valerie Kenney, is charged with a hate crime, and she could face three years in prison and a $25,000 fine if convicted.

"Attacking our headscarf is essentially trampling on the pride that we hold so dear," Chicago CAIR's Amina Sharif told Medill Reports. "An attack on the hijab is an attack on dignity and faith of God."

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia; US: Illinois; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; bullshiite; cair; christians; forthood; harrassment; hijab; holder; islam; jihad; muslim; muslims; muslimwomen; obama; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

1 posted on 11/21/2009 7:18:58 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

What’s with the use of the word “allegedly”??? The terrorist scum killed those soldiers. Yes, he isn’t convicted as yet, but he did kill them. Allegedly, my a**! Soon they’ll refer to the terrorist loser as “the gentleman who allegedly...”


2 posted on 11/21/2009 7:22:24 AM PST by hal ogen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I was in a bar with some friends a week ago, when one of their friends, a Muslim, commented on a commercial for the new Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 game. “That’s a good way to teach all the little kids how fun it is to kill muslims. That’s what that game is about—killing muslims.” Etc.

This was an Aha! moment for me when I realized that muslims really are more loyal to Islam than anything else. Even when the muslim is a completely “American,” westernized, bacon-eating one.

I also realized we could be up you-know-what creek if they decide to go guerilla on us or something.


3 posted on 11/21/2009 7:23:38 AM PST by Feline_AIDS (Boop boop hoop yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Typical PC BS. The woman will probably get more time than the murdering goat fornicator of Ft. Hood infamy.
It’s, at most, a disorderly conduct charge. Should be a butt chewing by the cops, and no more. End of story.


4 posted on 11/21/2009 7:24:10 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: hal ogen

Don’t let that bother you too much. It’s a liability issue. They have to use those “hedge” terms or they can and will be sued. Defense attorneys can also use those stories in their defense if the stories didn’t use the hedge terms (couldn’t get a fair trial, blah blah blah).

You have every right to be angry when they use those hedge terms AFTER conviction, like with that scumbag murderer Mummy aBull myJar, or whatever his invented name is.


6 posted on 11/21/2009 7:25:59 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
I agree. There is no “alleged” action going on.

They probably have the guy on tape slaughtering our military. The kid gloves given to terrorists is amazing.

7 posted on 11/21/2009 7:27:45 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Doesn’t that lady know that the future commissariat cadre and allies of the Democrat party have to be treated with kid gloves?

She can’t be disrespecting muslim women by pulling off a headscarf.

As for a muslim killing thirteen American Soldiers, well, he was just a nut case.

/s/

IMHO


8 posted on 11/21/2009 7:27:54 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Just as the 60’s radicals and the stupid leftist youth of today who protest and commit other crimes as part of “civil disobedience,” we may end up seeing a lot more of this type of “civil disobedience.”

When the people believe they are being railroaded and suppressed — as Americans who believe in traditional American culture have been feeling since the onslaught of “multiculturalism” — that, like any other breakdown of “justice,” often leads to vigilantism.


9 posted on 11/21/2009 7:28:07 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

With all DUE RESPECT, if these people love islam so much, why do they live here? Why did they come here? Right now they are outbreeding us 8 to 1.


10 posted on 11/21/2009 7:28:43 AM PST by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
“Attacking our headscarf is essentially trampling on the pride that we hold so dear,” Chicago CAIR’s Amina Sharif told Medill Reports. “An attack on the hijab is an attack on dignity and faith of God.”

Bull!

A headscarf by these cretin is homage to Satan.

11 posted on 11/21/2009 7:29:03 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
alleged lone wolf jihadist

woman grumbled about the massacre and tugged Alleged killer...presumed innocent until proved guilty despite a LOT of witnesses

But the scarf puller is convicted immediately in the press.

No bias there...nosiree.

12 posted on 11/21/2009 7:29:08 AM PST by SteamShovel (When hope trumps reality, there is no hope at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

What about the muslim who yanked the cross necklace off the neck of a customer at a mall kiosk? You didn’t hear hate crime for that. We need to fight all this with equal and opposite litigation at every point. That’s what they want? That’s what they get. Sometimes I wish I had become a lawyer...


13 posted on 11/21/2009 7:30:44 AM PST by BigFinn (Islam IS what Islam DOES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
So why is it OK to wear full Muslim garb and be OK but it is illegal to wear a Cross?
14 posted on 11/21/2009 7:33:11 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
This is definitely outrageous prosecutorial overkill. Its typical of a certain mindset that's more interested in protecting bogus “civil rights” than in stopping terrorism.
15 posted on 11/21/2009 7:34:32 AM PST by LuxAerterna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tillacum

“They are outbreeding us 8 to 1”

That’s the idea.

Why else do they go to live in the strangest, most unlikely places in the world to live? Places where the culture is the exact opposite of theirs? They are moving everywhere and populating the planet and infecting it with their sick cult.


16 posted on 11/21/2009 7:35:50 AM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: george76
So why is it OK to wear full Muslim garb and be OK but it is illegal to wear a Cross?
17 posted on 11/21/2009 7:36:53 AM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

18 posted on 11/21/2009 7:38:43 AM PST by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Mrs Kenney has no job pulling or tugging anyone's headscarf.

In what way was the "tugged on" woman related to Fort Hood? Give me a break. Some comments are really dim.

Now, the ridiculous "hate crime" charge and the subversive CAIR goons are a different story.

19 posted on 11/21/2009 7:38:43 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tillacum

The love the life and money, economy and freedoms that the infidels social system created that Islam could never create. Its those things that created the strong America of yesterday.

Show me one advancement Islam has given modern man. Show me one invention the third world masters have made to make their lives better.

Since the beginning of time, the advancements Sheik Ibn Hussein osamaObama speaks of are ones they inherited when they overran other cultures. They were the creation and sweat of someone else, not Islam.

Islam has failed its people at creating societal goods.


20 posted on 11/21/2009 7:41:14 AM PST by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson