Posted on 11/21/2009 6:29:53 AM PST by quegley
In response to the Columbia Journalism Review’s accusing me of “blackmailing” the Attorney General of the United States, I must take notice that the mainstream media as a journalistic establishment IS paying attention to the ongoing ACORN scandal. Good. I thought so. (snip) There will be consequences if there isn’t an investigation into ACORN. The videos will be shown and at a particular moment.
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
Blackmail connotes a “THREAT”... Breitbart sounds like a simple statement of FACT..
as the saying goes..
to Anger a Conservative ... LIE TO THEM.
to Anger a LIBERAL... TELL THEM THE TRUTH!
I think I have a man crush on Andrew. He’s doing far more damage to the Democrats and their sycophants thah the GOP would dare.
So to be clear . . . (according to the fourth estate) when upstart modern day Thomas Paine’s use undeniable truth to persuade the AG to live up to his responsibilities that is blackmailing while pimping out your vote for 190 million in government freebees is good government? Oh yeah and by the way . . . why doesn’t Mississippi qualify for the Reid bribe . . . they took just as much damage as Louisiana.
What facts and the truth do to a liberal is akin what sunlight does to a vampire.
Makes one wonder if he has something embarrassing starring the presstitutes.
Lib Big Media does what it always does when a Dem is in the White House. It goes and sits on its hands and pretends there’s nothing worth reporting. In truth they’re scared to death that more will be revealed with ACORN. There might just be more corruption between ACORN and certain politicians. Like the fool in the White House. They desperately don’t want to investigate that.
Bret loads up a rock.
He swings, it flies.
He hits Holder between the eyes.
Our affirmative action Attorney General staggers and falls.
Now we know who has the BALLS!
Andrew has stated that he has more than ACORN on tape. That fact alone probably gives the White House the shakes. SEIU? A Chicago connection? Ain’t speculation grand.
Andrew Breitbart had better watch his backside.
My thoughts as well - I hope for his sake he is well protected and had multiple trusted sources in possession of his information.
Isn’t this the same type of crap the Dem pulled in 06? Seems like I remember them using “opposition research” findings to convince certain Rep to seriously consider not running? They were fine with the entire concept then, so they should just be quiet and eat what Mr. B. is feeding them. It is, after all, their recipe.
Am thinking the videos he's talking about show evidence of RAT collusion with ACORN to affect elections.
While speculating, think about the possibility that the two young reporters dropped by some of the more radical congressional offices asking for the same kind of assistance.
Blackmail connotes a “THREAT”... Breitbart sounds like a simple statement of FACT..
Oh, I think it's a threat, all right - but a threat to exercise his constitutional rights in a way which would discommode the Attorney General . . . not different in principle from threatening to vote for a politician's opponent.It's also a petition for a redress of grievances.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.