Replies

So you disagree with Wright & Miller. What authority do you rely upon in doing so? How can Judge Robertson have found that he had jurisdiction without assuming that the plaintiff Hollister had standing? Since Wright & Miller cite a very substantial number of cases you would have to disagree with those cases as well. In fact I would point out that in an earlier filing on appeal in the Hollister case Bauer himself, as Obama's man who was crucial in putting him in office as part of the campaign and thus likely knew he was participating in the fraud concerning the COLB and the deprivation of the "intangible property right of honest services" stated to the Court of Appeals that Judge Robertson had "assumed" standing.

Thus you feel compelled, it seems to disagree with Bauer, who has just withdrawn in order to become WH counsel as part of the ongoing deprivation of honest services and who has spread his tentacles into the FEC and elsewhere to keep the fraud alive and the destruction of the Constitution going. My, you are devoted to the One.

Bauer, I would note, features on his web site that his father fought against Hitler, leaving Austria after the Anschluss and doing so in 1941. John Hemenway, who was, among other things a German expert serving in East Berlin against the communists during the Cold War, is on the record as having pointed out that the Nazis were not letting people like Bauer's father out in 1941. Moreover, Jonah Goldberg, in "Liberal Fascism" points out that the Dolfuss government was itself fascist, just not Hitler's fascists, so it would be interesting to know more about in just what capacity Bauer's father was fighting Hitler and it might shed light on why he is participating in imposing socialist fascism upon us now.

What is your motivation for standing up for the constitutional fraud involved even beyond the One's own henchman? What compulsion do you feel to protect the destruction of the Constitution that is underway?

“So you disagree with Wright & Miller.”

“What compulsion do you feel to protect the destruction of the Constitution that is underway?”

AV:

I agree fully with Wright & Miller and believe that you persist in misrepresenting them by conflating jurisdiction and standing in an illogical manner.

I support Hemenway’s appeal of the dismissal and his attempt to gain the standing for his claim that Robertson denied him.