[PapaBear3625]

To all who thought the MSM would not touch this:

NY Times covering the fraud means the dam is now officially broken.

[tired1]

I plead guilty. I’m amazed that it happened overnight!

[P-Marlowe]

NY Times covering the fraud means the dam is now officially broken.

No they are simply covering the "skeptics'" reaction to the e-mails.

They are NOT covering the e-mails.

They are NOT investigating whether or not there was fraud; they are simply reporting that "some people" will use these e-mails to say there was fraud.

One would think they would have 11 reporters scouring the e-mails to determine exactly who was falsifying information and what information was being falsified. But they are too busy looking for spelling and grammar errors in the Sarah Palin book, which they will categorically refuse to actually review.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Here is a thread to help with the damn break:

Alleged CRU Emails - Searchable ( Global Warming Hoax exposed....)

Credit for finding this goes to winoneforthegipper

[Old Professer]

This could get interesting; I’m still watching the arctic ice loss and we seem to have slipped into a pattern similar to that of 1910-1920; this disclosure, scandal, bump-in-the-road, etc. has probably scotched a series of doomsday releases from the advocacy press, at least.

There does seem to be a strong element of ‘suspicions confirmed’ here, though.

[netmilsmom]

I am VERY glad to be wrong.

Let’s see how far the dam flows.

[rlmorel]

I will have to check it out now that I am home. I find it hard to believe they are going to cover it substantially. I have a strong suspicion that they are going to turn this into a story of how the climate change deniers are trying to discredit the people who are trying to save the planet instead of concentrating on the deceit and subterfuge.