But the evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so broad and deep that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument.
Sure it isn't. Sure it isn't.
18 posted on 11/20/2009 3:14:31 PM PST by Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
But the evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so broad and deep that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument.
I guess the irony of making such a claim in an article about proof of forged AGW evidence sails right over Revkin's head.
The AGW movement has now entered the realm of self-parody.