Ross McKitrick sums up the Yamal tree ring affair in the Financial Post
**********************************EXCERPT*******************************
For those who dont know, Ross McKitrick of the University of Guelph co-authored the first paper with Steve McIntyre debunking Michael Manns first Hockey Stick paper, MBH98. Ross wrote this essay in todays Financial Post, excerpts are below. Please visit the story in that context here and patronize their advertisers. Anthony
Flawed climate data
Only by playing with data can scientists come up with the infamous hockey stick graph of global warming
Ross McKitrick, Financial Post
Friday, October 2, 2009
Beginning in 2003, I worked with Stephen McIntyre to replicate a famous result in paleoclimatology known as the Hockey Stick graph. Developed by a U.S. climatologist named Michael Mann, it was a statistical compilation of tree ring data supposedly proving that air temperatures had been stable for 900 years, then soared off the charts in the 20th century. Prior to the publication of the Hockey Stick, scientists had held that the medieval-era was warmer than the present, making the scale of 20th century global warming seem relatively unimportant. The dramatic revision to this view occasioned by the Hockey Sticks publication made it the poster child of the global warming movement. It was featured prominently in a 2001 report of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), as well as government websites and countless review reports.
Steve and I showed that the mathematics behind the Mann Hockey Stick were badly flawed, such that its shape was determined by suspect bristlecone tree ring data. Controversies quickly piled up: Two expert panels involving the U.S. National Academy of Sciences were asked to investigate, the U.S. Congress held a hearing, and the media followed the story around the world.
The expert reports upheld all of our criticisms of the Mann Hockey Stick, both of the mathematics and of its reliance on flawed bristlecone pine data.
Most of the proxy data does not show anything unusual about the 20th century. But two data series have reappeared over and over that do have a hockey stick shape. One was the flawed bristlecone data that the National Academy of Sciences panel said should not be used, so the studies using it can be set aside. The second was a tree ring curve from the Yamal Peninsula in Siberia, compiled by UK scientist Keith Briffa.
But an even more disquieting discovery soon came to light. Steve searched a paleoclimate data archive to see if there were other tree ring cores from at or near the Yamal site that could have been used to increase the sample size. He quickly found a large set of 34 up-to-date core samples, taken from living trees in Yamal by none other than Schweingruber himself!Had these been added to Briffas small group the 20th century would simply be flat. It would appear completely unexceptional compared to the rest of the millennium.
The comments at Climate Audit are priceless. And they are digging through the content of what was discovered. It’s mind boggling. See comment #25, NY Times columnist Andrew Revkin to Michael Mann and responses re: McIntyre destroying the Yamal Tree Ring support of AGW.
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7806#comment-366040