[cantfindagoodscreenname]

See NY Times thread, posts 31, 34, 35, 36.

Woah! Thank you!

[PapaBear3625]

What gets revealed in the emails between the NY Times reporter and the researchers, is how they have subverted the system to ensure that the only allowed viewpoint is the pro-warming viewpoint. From post 34 of the NY Times thread:

if McIntyre had a legitimate point, he would submit a comment to the journal in question. of course, the last time he tried that (w/ our '98 article in Nature), his comment was rejected.

They are in control of the journals. No anti-warming comment is allowed to be published, and no viewpoint that is not published in a peer-reviewed journal is "legitimate".