Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change
An interesting feature of the cladogram in the article is that it depicts organisms splitting into just two lines, the original disappearing. But why would an ancestor of humans and apes for example, not split into humans, apes, and a dozen other creatures instead of just two?

And why would the ancestor of humans, or any other creature, not survive along with the differing branches that evolved from it?

Kind of like the answer in the form of a question, *If Americans came from Europeans, then why are there still Europeans?*.

Funny how the evos want to have their cake and eat it to.

64 posted on 11/19/2009 5:21:49 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
That's the Orphan Child Theory of Evolution. When Ardi and her husband, Tiny Teeth, had a child that could walk better than they could they starved to death. ........Or something.

On the European vs. American question Darwin said it had been demonstrated that Europeans had bigger brains so maybe according to Darwinism Americans are devolved, And I suppose he'd get no argument in Europe.

77 posted on 11/19/2009 6:04:34 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson