[tacticalogic]

Let’s suppose for a moment that an individual Creationist or an IDer did lie, should that invalidate the argument from Creation/ID? If so, does this same standard apply to evolution with respect to all the liars and frauds that have plagued the evo-camp all these years?

Aren't we being implicitly asked by the author to judge all the scientific evidence and theories on the basis of one man having unfairly accused creationists of lying?

[GodGunsGuts]

Actaully, that is a standard tactic among evos...and you don’t have to go any further than FR to see regularly employed. But if you do go beyond FR, you will find that the evos on FR learned this tactic from the high priests of the Temple of Darwin (such as the evo geologist mentioned in this very article).