[Misterioso]

Tax-chick says: Well, everyone offering interpretations of the unobserved past lacks the most basic information ... that which they would have gained by observing the events as they happened. Everyone also lacks the evidence they would gain by reproducing the events in an experiment.

This should apply to anyone depending on the Bible for "facts" to prove creationist theory, since creationists weren't there to observe them.

[demshateGod]

If the Christians decided to do that, would you follow? If not, then you’re not after the truth, just arguments.

But her point is valid. “Scientist” are telling little kids, at my expense, that what they have is factual science. When I teach kids about the Bible, at my own expense, I tell them it’s faith. Not that faith has no substance. In fact, it’s the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen.