You need me to actually show you a modern study on how cladograms are constructed using DNA analysis to contradict your ignorant assertion that they are both constructed and confirmed using only morphological features?
One study of MANY THOUSANDS, that show that cladograms are NOT constructed and confirmed based entirely upon morphological features. They are constructed based upon a shared derived morphological feature, and CONFIRMED by DNA analysis.
But you have shown that you know nothing about the subject, and can only misrepresent the actual state of the science.
Creationists must misrepresent science out of necessity.
The “only” is your word not mine and your citation has nothing to do with what I said. And actually I don’t need you to show anything to overturn arguments that I haven’t made.
But bang on if you must, I’ve no more time for your unsupported assertions.