Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; metmom
Nothing is misclassified about Lucy, she is an australopithocine. But again if you rely upon creationist sources you will be misinformed; because creationists misrepresent science out of necessity.

Lucy has been totlaly discredited; yet Evo's still use it.

165 posted on 11/20/2009 9:54:43 AM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: celmak
The Cretarded think that Lucy has been “discredited” only because they rely upon creationist sources.

Creationist sources misrepresent science out of necessity.

Lucy was not misidentified or misclassified. Lucy is an australopithocine, an extensively studied archaic species from many different fossils.

But if you rely upon Cretarded sources you wouldn't be expected to know that. Creationist misrepresent science out of necessity.

167 posted on 11/20/2009 9:59:44 AM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson