Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: celmak
Avoiding the question? You also forget the whole premise of this thread; that Creationist are so called “liars.”

I'm simply examining your premise (that Darwin should not be considered a scientist because he studied theology, and did not have degree in a biology). Before I adopt that criteria as being a valid test of whether someone should be considered a scientist or not, I want to examine it on it's merits and see if it holds true. If it does not, then I have to ask why you've chosen to adopt it, and why you think I should.

113 posted on 11/20/2009 6:35:55 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic; celmak
I'm simply examining your premise (that Darwin should not be considered a scientist because he studied theology, and did not have degree in a biology). Before I adopt that criteria as being a valid test of whether someone should be considered a scientist or not, I want to examine it on it's merits and see if it holds true. If it does not, then I have to ask why you've chosen to adopt it, and why you think I should.

Celmak note.....nail, jello, wall.....

120 posted on 11/20/2009 7:13:00 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic; celmak; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; Gordon Greene; Ethan Clive Osgoode; ...
I'm simply examining your premise (that Darwin should not be considered a scientist because he studied theology, and did not have degree in a biology). Before I adopt that criteria as being a valid test of whether someone should be considered a scientist or not, I want to examine it on it's merits and see if it holds true. If it does not, then I have to ask why you've chosen to adopt it, and why you think I should.

Well, if not having a degree in science is irrelevant to whether someone is called a scientist or not and Darwin can be considered a scientist with only a degree in theology, then there's no justification for the evos to reject any of the claims of being a scientist made by IDers or creationists, some of whom do actually hold actual degrees in science, something Darwin could never claim.

121 posted on 11/20/2009 7:16:29 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic
Before I adopt that criteria as being a valid test of whether someone should be considered a scientist or not, I want to examine it on it's merits and see if it holds true. If it does not, then I have to ask why you've chosen to adopt it, and why you think I should.

So when you finally figure out whether or not it holds true...

I wait with bated breath.

239 posted on 11/20/2009 1:55:28 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson