Achtung, You have the right remain silent. Anything you say can be held against you in a court of law.....
OMG
Posted on 11/18/2009 3:53:09 PM PST by DBlake
Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham, skewers Attorney General Eric Holder's .... Must see video
You are an enemy combatant. You have the right to die. If you give up the right to die, anything you say will result in a firing squad.
Nowhere did I hear Sen. Gramnesty credit Mark Levin for his talking points.
I guarantee either the senator or one of his staffers was taking notes yesterday.
F NO!!!!!!!!
66% no, 34% YES??? Insane.
Achtung, You have the right remain silent. Anything you say can be held against you in a court of law.....
OMG
Please watch this one and pass it to your email lists. Senator Graham chastises Att. Gen. Eric Holder for bringing KSM to civilian court.
http://hotairpundit.blogspot.com/2009/11/lindsey-graham-destroys-attorney.html
Graham brings up the question: Where would Osama Bin Laden be tried if we captured him tomorrow? Attorney General gets stumped continually...
Graham: “Under domestic criminal law, the moment the person is in the hands of the United States government they’re entitled to be told they have a right to a lawyer and can remain silent, and if we go down that road, we are gonna make this country less safe”
Here’s a little reminder of Eric Holder who was Deputy Attorney General under Janet Reno in 1999 answering questions about the clemency of the 16 FALN terrorists before the Senate Judiciary Committee, this is not the first time this guy has done stuff that’s questionable...
Rule .303
He should have let go of Holder’s neck to give credit to Mark Levin? Graham, a military judge, could not have possibly thought of these glaring law questions on his own?
The fact that some even ask such a question is insane!!
How can you even think of fighting a war (and win) with idiots that think like this in charge.
Graham - no.
He doesn’t seem to grasp immigration law. Why would this aspect of the law be any different?
Besides, Gramnesty knows not to go too far or be too aggressive. It might hurt him when he finally decides to announce his switch to the Democrat party.
Oh damn, I say just take no prisoners. Kill em all on the battle field and thus no miranda rights needed.
If you fight against the United States we will give you, a lifetime pension, free health care, a college education an the school of your choice, a 100 acre farm plus a tractor to work the land, and loans sufficient to set you up in business. The trick is not to get killed while fighting against us and to be captured by a uniformed member of the armed forces./s
I realize that the United States did not provide the terrorists with a wife for their use after capture but the Government is working on that and hopes to have a solution soon.
Wow. 28% are so deranged that they actually said “yes” to this poll. America is in big trouble.
The only Miranda rights that our enemies should be given are the Carmen Miranda rights - a banana up the a*s and a banana-clip to the head.
For those of you youngsters, look her up on the internet.
Hint: Her tropical fruit hat would go over well in San Francisco.
as of now
Should enemy combatants have Miranda rights?
Yes 19%
No 81%Y
ou voted: No
as of now
Should enemy combatants have Miranda rights?
Yes 19%
No 81%
You voted: No
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.