Posted on 11/18/2009 2:21:29 PM PST by blam
Yes there was an article this one I bet
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article14996.html
Also worth reading
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/11/whats-fed-hiding.html
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/kirby/2009/1009.html
http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/10/gold-market-reaching-breaking-point.html
http://www.scribd.com/word/embed/21133990
Nickels always seem so useless...That’s a coin that should be discontinued....
along with the stupid penny. The $4.99 and $6.99 and $1999.99...Duh...Like I think we figured it out!!
It’s time once again to trot out my currency and coinage reform proposal.
Given that there has been ample inflation on the order of 10 since the last change, and we have an excessive array of confusing coins and low-value currency, it is time for a practical simplification.
First, denominations need to proceed in a proportional way without large value ratios or crowded ratios. The classic 1-5-10-50-100... progression with ratios of 2.0-5.0 is ideal as a minimum, with denominations of 2, 20, etc. being optional for important valuations.
Second, we want to avoid coins of such low value that they are more trouble than they are worth. Economic waste occurs with the extra time wasted dealing with needlessly small coins. A dime is worth less than a minute of labor at minimum wages, and no currency transaction requires anything smaller than this denomination. The penny and the half-cent served well as the smallest denominations when their values were that of today’s dime. Note that electronic transactions are often conducted in smaller units than our smallest coin, and that cash registers have been “rounding” (without bias up or down) to the nearest small coin for sales tax purposes for generations.
Third, we want to set the coin/currency transition at a practical level that avoids our wallets being overstuffed with small bills, or our pockets with too many coins. Coins should be suitable for purchases like a magazine, a coffee, a lunch, or a brief cab ride.
Fourth, the ratio between the largest and smallest coin should be limited to a practical factor. Consider that the economy functions effectively with coins at 0.05, 0.10, and 0.25, with pennies treated as trash, and larger coins generally not used. That is a factor of 5 between the largest and smallest coin. A factor of 10-50 may be ideal, and a factor of 100 (as in actual current coinage) is excessive.
Fifth, we need bills of adequately high value for large cash purchases (consider the largest Euro note has a value of about 7.5 times that of the largest US note.)
Sixth, coins should be sized approximately proportional to their value for ease of recognition and use.
The proposal:
Coins:
$0.10 (slightly smaller than the current dime)
$0.50 (slightly smaller than the current nickel, larger than the penny)
$1.00 (slightly smaller than the current quarter dollar, larger than the nickel)
$5.00 (slightly smaller than the current half-dollar) Or it could be set at $2 to avoid overlap with a $5 note.
Currency Notes:
$5 (optional)
$10
$20 (optional)
$50
$100
$500
Our current 6 coins are replaced with 4.
Our current 7 notes are replaced with 4-6.
If you want to talk about making coins out of silver or gold, thats another topic.
Nope. I had the same thought.
I gotta go get some tomorrow and I’m stopping at the grocery store tonight for pumpkin.
Based on curent prices, a pre 64 quarter is worth over $3.00
Copper is most valuable today in the form of a FMJ bullet. If you have enogh FMJ, you may not have to worry about the price of gold.
That proposal of your has the smell of democrat. Are you admitting that you want the current administration to continue their nonsence forever?
That proposal of your has the smell of democrat. Are you admitting that you want the current administration to continue their nonsence forever?
Your proposal does nothing more than to facilitate the destruction of the currency, by making it easier to count change. I would prefer the old way. Although I ust admit that toting $500 or $1,000 in gold coin was a bit much after awhile.
Your proposal does nothing more than to facilitate the destruction of the currency, by making it easier to count change. I would prefer the old way. Although I ust admit that toting $500 or $1,000 in gold coin was a bit much after awhile.
Are you happy now?
Nothing destroys a currency like being able to count change, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.