Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China not needed in South Asia, angry India tells US
ZEENEWS.COM ^ | 18th November 2009 | Zeenews Bureau

Posted on 11/18/2009 3:22:56 AM PST by cold start

New Delhi: Angered by US President Barack Obama’s attempt to envisage a role for China in South Asia, India on Wednesday made it clear that it objects any move to give a wider footprint to China in the region.

The Ministry of External Affairs said that it had objections to Obama giving China a greater role in South Asian affairs, adding a third country’s role cannot be envisaged in the bilateral relationships between countries of the region.

The MEA further said a role for a third country in the region was not necessary and India was committed to resolving all issues with Pakistan bilaterally.

The US and China had yesterday voiced support for the improvement in Indo-Pak ties and their readiness to promote peace and stability in the region.

A joint statement issued at the conclusion of Obama's talks with his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao in Beijing listed the situation in South Asia among regional and global challenges.

The two countries “support the efforts of Afghanistan and Pakistan to fight terrorism, maintain domestic stability and achieve sustainable economic and social development, and support the improvement and growth of relations between India and Pakistan”, the joint statement said.

“The two sides are ready to strengthen communication, dialogue and cooperation on issues related to South Asia and work together to promote peace, stability and development in that region,” it added.

The US Ambassador to India, Timothy J Roemer today avoided responding to queries on the US-China joint statement, saying he had yet to take a close look at it.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asiantripfailure; china; gaffe; india; kaliyuga; kashmir; obama; obamagaffe; pakistan; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: artaxerces; Oztrich Boy

The INS Viraat left refit a month ago and it’s Harriers are getting an upgrade-Anyway it’s primary purpose will be fleet escort and ASW work, not attaining air superiority against any navy-it’s a job it can do with helicopters backed by land based fighters.

Where did you get the number of phased air radar equipped Chinese ships as five???Most sources put them at 2.And if they were so good, why did the PLAN build two older escort vessels equipped with the Russian Rif and not Chinese HQ-9??? And there is no conclusive proof that the PLAN has AIP equipped subs other than fan boy websites. And your assertion that each of China’s fleets is better than the whole Indian navy-well how many ships does the PLAN have deployed in the Indian Ocean??? None, because they also have to take care of Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam and of course the US of A.

About Chinese bases in the IOR-there are NONE yet. Most Chinese “allies” in the region are a bunch of dirt poor states such as Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Myanmar which survive on Indian benevolence. The only real ally is Pakistan which is a failed state surviving on US and Saudi handouts.


21 posted on 11/18/2009 8:13:21 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Only a very small fraction of the chinese fleet is capable of being deployed to IOR
Any chinese attempt to enter IOR has to cross malacca straits
and then the Indian Andaman island bases and it is a several thousand mile journey

Next the entire Indian land mass is effectively a giant aircraft carrier, since most of the IOR is targetable by Indian land based missiles and planes


22 posted on 11/18/2009 8:24:22 PM PST by ShyamSunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cold start

bump


23 posted on 11/18/2009 8:57:07 PM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (There was a hole here. It's gone now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artaxerces

Ok, again:

MAritime Strike Force:

What exactly is the PLAN’s capability in this area?

I know that the IAF has coastal defence capability based upon Mig-29’s and Jaguar IM’s.

Now tell me, what is the PLAN using for coastal defence?

And what maritime strike capability does the PLAN have? IN may have 14 carrier based harriers, and 1 carrier, but thats up against ZERO carrier based aircraft, and ZERO carriers for the PLAN.


24 posted on 11/18/2009 9:39:00 PM PST by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“The INS Viraat left refit a month ago and it’s Harriers are getting an upgrade-Anyway it’s primary purpose will be fleet escort and ASW work, not attaining air superiority against any navy-it’s a job it can do with helicopters backed by land based fighters.”

So bottom line, the carrier is from 1953, it’s old Harriers has maintenance issues due to lack of spare parts. I really don’t see this carrier as a significant factor, especially since the PLAN has deployed satellite-guided carrier killers:

http://www.military.com/news/article/April-2009/new-concerns-over-chinese-carrier-killer.html

Without fleet-wide air defense, the Viraat would be sunk within the first hour of a shooting war.

“Where did you get the number of phased air radar equipped Chinese ships as five???Most sources put them at 2.And if they were so good, why did the PLAN build two older escort vessels equipped with the Russian Rif and not Chinese HQ-9??? “

It’s actually 4 fleet air defense ships deployed: 2 type 051Cs(with Russian Phase array radars) and 2 type 052Cs (with Indigenous Phase array radars). With supposedly a third 052C under construction.

http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/vessel.asp

“And there is no conclusive proof that the PLAN has AIP equipped subs other than fan boy websites.”

They apparently have 6 AIP equipped Kilos and 4 AIP equipped Yuans according to all the public sources.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_041_submarine
http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/howtomakewar/databases/submarine_database/submarines.asp
http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/sub/yuan.asp

“And your assertion that each of China’s fleets is better than the whole Indian navy-well how many ships does the PLAN have deployed in the Indian Ocean??? None, because they also have to take care of Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam and of course the US of A.”

I’m just stating the obvious. On a qualitative level, each of the 3 Chinese fleets are minimally equipped with a set of technologies and deployed capabilities that the entire Indian Navy does not currently possess. These are the following as I see them:

1. Nuclear and AIP Submarines
2. Fleet wide air defense ships
3. Long range LACMs and Satellite guided TBM/MRBMs
4. AWACs
5. Space-based targeting/guidance/early-warning assets

On top of the technological advantages, there is also the numerical advantage. The PLAN simply outnumbers the IN 3 to 1 in most categories.


25 posted on 11/19/2009 7:56:29 AM PST by artaxerces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

“MAritime Strike Force:

What exactly is the PLAN’s capability in this area?”

To my understanding, the PLAN’s naval air wing consists of ~25 Su-30MKKs, ~100 JH-7As. ~100 J-8IIMs, ~100 J-7Es.

http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/aircraft.asp

“I know that the IAF has coastal defence capability based upon Mig-29’s and Jaguar IM’s.”

Training requirements are different between naval aviator pilots and air force pilots. Plane specifications(Radar, airframe) also needs to be modified due to different operating environments. For one thing, How will those IAF fighters even find enemy ships operating 400-500 kilometers from the Indian Coastline?


26 posted on 11/19/2009 8:39:17 AM PST by artaxerces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: artaxerces

Yawn-so tell me how does the Chinese silver bullet anti-ship ballistic missile reach the Viraat in the Arabian Sea or Bay of Bengal??? All the sources you quoted are at best dubious.

About all the assets you talk about-how many of these are DEPLOYED against the IN-it’s one thing to have it in the South China Sea. Quiet another to have these in the Indian Ocean


27 posted on 11/19/2009 8:49:57 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Yawn-so tell me how does the Chinese silver bullet anti-ship ballistic missile reach the Viraat in the Arabian Sea or Bay of Bengal??? All the sources you quoted are at best dubious.”

Umm....the DF-21C has a range of 2000km. When launched from South eastern China, it pretty covers most of the Indian Ocean.

Moreover, nobody is talking about an all out naval war in South Asia. I don’t think any country in the area wants that right now. I’m merely pointing out that given the numerical and qualitative superiority that the PLAN has over the IN, China has a significant influence in the South Asian region whether India want’s it or not.

This is similar to the U.S position. We are going to have influence in South Asia regardless of India’s concerns simply because America is the superpower. These are just facts on the ground.


28 posted on 11/19/2009 9:04:04 AM PST by artaxerces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cold start

Just like Obama, and Clinton for that matter. Ignore your friends, and kiss your enemy’s asses.


29 posted on 11/19/2009 9:06:11 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artaxerces

Umm ok, I should assume that a ballistic missile launched from China will be able to hit a moving carrier 2,000 km away-yeah right.

About Chinese capabilities-nobody’s doubting that. I’m only asking if any of it is IN THE REGION-how many warships and aircraft does the PLA have in South Asia????


30 posted on 11/19/2009 10:12:24 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The PLAN DF-21C anti-ship Ballistic Missile was confirmed by the USN earlier this year. They are apparently developing plans with their SM-3s to defend against it. Please read the link to the U.S Navy announcement on the reference that I cited earlier.

If you feel that you are correct and that the USN intelligence is wrong then that is your business.


31 posted on 11/19/2009 10:31:11 AM PST by artaxerces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: midnightcat

>.As an aside, I know an awful lot of Indians who voted for BO.

Yes, and when they visit India, they will prolly get an earful if the hosts let down their politeness and etiquette.

Some here simply cannot understand why the Indians appreciate Bush and the amazing strides made in military to military cooperation between the two countries.

They are ignorant, despite being highly educated and succesful, and drank that Hawaiian KoolAid deeply.


32 posted on 11/19/2009 11:14:13 AM PST by swarthyguy (THERE WILL BE A BLOODBATH - Matthew Hoh/MSNBC on what happens when US leaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

Yeah, like Kal Penn.


33 posted on 11/19/2009 12:19:07 PM PST by midnightcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: artaxerces

What does US-intelligence say about Chinese DEPLOYMENTS in the Indian Ocean???? I’m still waiting to hear a word from you on that.

The DF-21 wonder weapon is obviously a threat but the not kind of silver bullet you are drumming it be based on some Chicom fanboy sites.


34 posted on 11/19/2009 8:10:27 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Because Obama’s a globalist. Fear his Midas Touch.


35 posted on 11/21/2009 1:59:08 AM PST by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carley

Unless they can draw a red dot on Obama’s forehead.


36 posted on 11/21/2009 2:00:08 AM PST by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson