Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editor of Runners World released a statement about the NEWSWEEK cover:
runners world ^ | November 17, 2009 | BigTigerMike

Posted on 11/17/2009 7:37:04 PM PST by Bigtigermike

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Bigtigermike
World will take any legal action or if they even can? are photographers agencies in total control of the photo's?

the photo did appear in the Runner' mag. They hired and paid the photog. for the work. They own it. The photog. had no right to sell it.

This was a sleazy move by Newsweek - but in the long run, it does them the harm it hoped it would do Sarah. People do not like someone treating Sarah like this.

Here's another photo that was in 'Runner's'

Sweet little Trig. What a testament he is to the character of his momma.

21 posted on 11/17/2009 7:53:13 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby
I read hi-lites with Obama and Galant

LOL! Sadly, I know what you are talking about...

22 posted on 11/17/2009 7:53:25 PM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jackson57

exactly. It was obvious a freelance job and the photography had rights that reverted back to the photographer after the first publication rights. This is not unusual but in this case given the fame level and controversy and abuse of this public figure it should have been nipped in the bud at contract time. As mentioned in another post if this contract was written after and during her time as VP candidate someone REALLY screwed up at RW. I used to oversee this sort of production work and it is not as though any good photographer couldn’t have shot this. RW could have easily kept the full rights for this image.


23 posted on 11/17/2009 7:57:42 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb

Then why would Runners World say it was w/o their knowledge or permission?


24 posted on 11/17/2009 7:57:51 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer
"Why is everyone looking at this photo like it is a bad thing? Sarah looks stunning in it. She appears to be in incredible shape "

Another pic from Runner's World.

yitbos

25 posted on 11/17/2009 7:58:23 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

lovely!


26 posted on 11/17/2009 7:58:50 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I think the whole thing is great. Just another example (as if we need any more) of the snarky depths the Palin haters will go to in their attempts to marginalize her, and in the process making themselves look ridiculous.


27 posted on 11/17/2009 8:03:02 PM PST by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bad Jack Bauer
Why is everyone looking at this photo like it is a bad thing? Sarah looks stunning in it.

I totally agree and felt that Sarah should have just ignored Newsweek. Besides, I was in the grocery store waiting to check out and some woman holding the cover remarked that "she wishes she looked this good when she turns 50."

28 posted on 11/17/2009 8:03:05 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Period, unless the photograph is a “work for hire.”


29 posted on 11/17/2009 8:04:02 PM PST by piytar (Go Away RNC, Steele, Graham, and the rest of the lib-loser GOP. WE'RE TAKING OUR PARTY BACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Here's the fun part - even lib women say this was a sleaze move - even WHOOPIE!

CAn anyone say ‘backfire?”

30 posted on 11/17/2009 8:05:02 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Runners World does many stories on running celebs etc

Did a great one on President Bush marathoner

Another on Gen Petraeus

Even one on Gore

One on Palin was very well done

Been a subscriber since 78


31 posted on 11/17/2009 8:05:30 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Newsweek E-mails: They need to be harassed

evan.thomas@newsweek.com,grace.huh@newsweek.com,katherine.barna@newsweek.com,jan.angilella@newsweek.com,Letters@newsweek.com,Editors@newsweek.com,
tech@newsweek.com,webeditors@newsweek.com,kenneth.woodward@newsweek.com,comments@fareedzakaria.com,pat.wingert@newsweek.com,webeditors@newsweek.com,
internationalsubs@newsweekmag.com,Jerry.Adler@newsweek.com,lorraine.ali@newsweek.com,david.alpern@newsweek.com,jonathan.alter@newsweek.com,
david.ansen@newsweek.com,holly.bailey@newsweek.com,julia.baird@newsweek.com,john.barry@newsweek.com,jeffrey.bartholet@newsweek.com,sharon.begley@newsweek.com,
bret.begun@newsweek.com,jessica.bennett@newsweek.com,martha.brant@newsweek.com,darrenbriscoe@newsweek.com,mary.carmichael@newsweek.com,
eleanor.clift@newsweek.com,katie.connolly@newsweek.com,ellis.cose@newsweek.com,jonathan.darman@newsweek.com,babak.dehghanpisheh@newsweek.com,
kathy.deveny@newsweek.com,christopher.dickey@newsweek.com,tony.emerson@newsweek.com,howard.fineman@newsweek.com,arian.flores@newsweek.com,

rana.foroohar@newsweek.com,arlyn.gajilan@newsweek.com,arlene.getz@newsweek.com,devin.gordon@newsweek.com,susan.greenberg@newsweek.com,
daniel.gross@newsweek.com,fred.guterl@newsweek.com,nisid.hajari@newsweek.com,michael.hirsh@newsweek.com,mark.hosenball@newsweek.com,
michael.isikoff@newsweek.com,scott.johnson@newsweek.com,malcolm.jones@newsweek.com,barbara.Kantrowitz@newsweek.com,larry.kaplow@newsweek.com,
daniel.klaidman@newsweek.com,weston.kosova@newsweek.com,Melinda.Liu@newsweek.com,daniel.mcginn@newsweek.com,cathleen.mcguigan@newsweek.com,
Stryker.McGuire@newsweek.com,jon.meacham@newsweek.com,susannah.meadows@newsweek.com,lisa.miller@newsweek.com,mark.miller@newsweek.com,
andrew.nagorski@newsweek.com,david.noonan@newsweek.com,kevin.peraino@newsweek.com,marc.peyser@newsweek.com,anna.quindlen@newsweek.com,jane.quinn@newsweek.com,
johnnie.roberts@newsweek.com,andrew.romano@newsweek.com,debra.rosenberg@newsweek.com,allison.samuels@newsweek.com,robert.samuelson@newsweek.com,
samseibert@newsweek.com,ramin.setoodeh@newsweek.com,suzanne.smalley@newsweek.com,richard.smith@newsweek.com,mark.starr@newsweek.com,linda.stern@newsweek.com,
carl.sullivan@newsweek.com,stuart.taylor@newsweek.com,jonathan.tepperman@newsweek.com,evan.thomas@newsweek.com,steve.tuttle@newsweek.com,george.will@newsweek.com,
pat.wingert@newsweek.com,Kenneth.Woodward@newsweek.com, fareed.zakaria@newsweek.com,


32 posted on 11/17/2009 8:06:13 PM PST by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Period, unless they have sold their rights to the photograph (ie, did not retain any).

Etc.


33 posted on 11/17/2009 8:06:42 PM PST by piytar (Go Away RNC, Steele, Graham, and the rest of the lib-loser GOP. WE'RE TAKING OUR PARTY BACK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

I use that photo on my website, shes a beauty.
http://www.brayincandy.com

Pray for America and Lady Palin


34 posted on 11/17/2009 8:11:17 PM PST by bray (America Gu Bra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton

You are suggesting “work for hire”. Any photographer worth his salt woudl reject a work for hire offer.


35 posted on 11/17/2009 8:11:49 PM PST by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: al baby

That is freaky. I just thought of that specific part of that magazine today. Yikes


36 posted on 11/17/2009 8:17:21 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Photographers own the copyright on their photographs. Period.

Not necessarily accurate. You can sign agreement with a freelancer that all photos that you pay for belong to you and only you. You own the "negatives" (today pixels) and all rights to them.

I learned this the hard way back in the 70s when someone in my company hired a freelancer to take a photo specified for a specific brochure. It was a great photo and afterward ended up being used in a number of applications. The photographer came back and sued for copyright violation and it was a mess. We ended up paying him off (and he screwed himself totally BTW because we never used him again) and revised the services contract so that anything a freelance photographed under contract to us was our property, and he had zero rights to it. The contract required the photographer deliver the negatives to us.

Much different in the digital world today, but just because someone takes a photo does not mean they own it. Read the contract.

37 posted on 11/17/2009 8:21:22 PM PST by Ditto (Directions for Clean Government: If they are in, vote them out. Rinse and repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MaxCUA

You are very good, keep it up!


38 posted on 11/17/2009 8:24:14 PM PST by mojo114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mojo114

agoldman@ap.org, akennedy@ap.org, amiga@ap.org, asanner@ap.org, ataxin@ap.org, awestfeldt@ap.org, bdobbin@ap.org, bdraper@ap.org, bfouhy@ap.org, blewis@ap.org, cbabington@ap.org, cbarry@ap.org, clong@ap.org, crugaber@ap.org, cwoodward@ap.org, dbauder@ap.org, ddaniel@ap.org, despo@ap.org, dgram@ap.org, dhastings@ap.org

dkdaniel@ap.org, dnephin@ap.org, esimon@ap.org, evandore@ap.org, fdemilio@ap.org, fklug@ap.org, gjohnson@ap.org, gkatz@ap.org, gmulvihill@ap.org, gwong@ap.org, hjkorea@ap.org, javersa@ap.org, jbarbassa@ap.org, jbilleaud@ap.org, jhdavis@ap.org, jheintz@ap.org, jholland@ap.org, jkuhnhenn@ap.org

gdjohnson@ap.org, jsong@ap.org, kdaigle@ap.org, kgannon@ap.org, kritter@ap.org, lbaldor@ap.org, ldeutsch@ap.org, lshepherd@ap.org, lsidoti@ap.org, mapuzzo@ap.org, mbaker@ap.org, mcrutsinger@ap.org, mdale@ap.org, mgordon@ap.org, mlee@ap.org, mniesse@ap.org, mrobinson@ap.org, mvolz@ap.org, npickler@ap.org, ntoosi@ap.org

orodriguez@ap.org, pames@ap.org, pelliott@ap.org, pgorndi@ap.org, phess@ap.org, pjrlinek@ap.org, ppylas@ap.org, psvensson@ap.org, pyost@ap.org, razalivar@ap.org, rburns@ap.org, rfoley@ap.org, rfournier@ap.org, rnakashima@ap.org, rpyle@ap.org, sbauer@ap.org, sgraham@ap.org, squinn@ap.org, stheimer@ap.org, tcone@ap.org

tparadis@ap.org, traum@ap.org, tross@ap.org, ttompson@ap.org, wmccall@ap.org, zkaram@ap.org


39 posted on 11/17/2009 8:27:16 PM PST by MaxCUA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
Everybody's right, everybody's wrong, everyone, or many above, think they know everything about publishing rights. Whatevah! Whoever owns the rights to the pitcher, it is highly unusual and cheap for a magazine, isn't it, to re-publish a photograph that was recently printed in another popular magazine, and on the cover no less. It speaks of desperation of the MSM, while specialized magazines like Runner's World and Guns and Ammo seem to be doing A-OK, ya?
40 posted on 11/17/2009 8:34:39 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson