The California State Bar rule regarding attorneys having sex with clients is here.
Thanks for the link.
Given my laymen’s reading, it appears there is no major ethical problem with Lincoln and Taitz getting it on, unless a quid pro quo could be proven. But Lincoln doesn’t allege that sex was part of the QPQ he referenced so it’s probably “ethical” per the site you supplied.
Still icky and weird, but technically ethical by CBA standards. Then again, I’m sure the CBA will be busy enough with other complaints against her.
