I have no doubt whatsoever that Obama is ineligible to hold the office of POTUS.
Re: #1 - Yes, morally and ethically we have the right to question his eligibility. However, when Obama became the President-Elect, we no longer had access to the courts as a means to question his eligibility. (The POTUS doesn’t control our money, the Congress does.)
Re: #2 - You file suit in your home state outlining the corruption and or laws broken by those officials. (That’s where I am pursuing this issue. The Texas Democratic Party broke numerous laws in nominating Obama. I don’t expect a reversal of the 2008 nomination because it simply won’t happen. What I expect to accomplish is to force the legislature to mandate a process by which candidates must prove their constitutional eligibility and I expect to force the TX SOS to seek legal guidance from the SCOTUS regarding Obama’s eligibility since the definition of NBC is unclear and unresolved.)
Re: #3 - Yes and no. Since there are no laws establishing how he must prove his eligibility, I expect his defense team to do their jobs in disputing the validity of eligibility lawsuits. I would expect an eligible and honorable man to hand over proof without being sued, but clearly Obama is neither. He’s behaving like the thug he is. That in itself is not unexpected.
Please disregard Post 80.
It's geared toward Non-Sequitur and MLO.
Glad to see that you find Obama's behavior suspicious as well.