[mlo]

"Suppose I applied for an office job at Chevron, and the management asked that I provide them with certain information. If I refuse to give them any information and instead sent a lawyer after them for this request, would that be an appropriate response?"

As already explained, this is not the current scenario. He hasn't sent lawyers after anybody. There isn't an employer asking for his information. It's not a matter of "asking simple questions".

Various lawyers have filed *lawsuits* in various courts. In that scenario, of course his lawyers are going to respond. Not only is that appropriate, it's necessary. You need to deal with the facts as they are.

[BuckeyeTexan]

You need to deal with the facts as they are.

A little optimistic today, are we? :)

[GI Joe Fan]

"There isn't an employer asking for his information..."

Uh, since when do US citizens/taxpayers not have the right to make sure the Constitution is followed?

We The People are Obama's employers.

Why aren't we allowed to verify if he has the right to hold office?

[GI Joe Fan]

It's not a matter of "asking simple questions".

But it is.

If Obama produced valid proof that he has the Constitutional right to hold office as President, then all of this money/time/energy would not be wasted.

Even YOU must admit that.