Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: so_real

“Wonder if that idiot judge said something in his diatribe that would circumspectly open a can of worms for the pres—ent.”

Yes! After Taitz filed a motion to reconsider, the plaintiff, Rhodes, attempted to contact the court to object to the filing.

Instead of advising the plaintiff to contact her attorney and inform her of plaintiff’s demand to cease and desist, the Clerk of the Court began negotiating with the plaintiff to file a motion with the court. The Clerk of the Court knew the plaintiff was represented by an attorney. The only appropriate response would have been to instruct the plaintiff to contact her representative (Taitz).

The Clerk of the Court stepped in it further by contacting the US Attorney’s office and informing him of plaintiff’s ex-parte communications with the Court.

When this is over, it will be a laundry list of ethics violations against Judge Land and the US Attorney’s office.


18 posted on 11/17/2009 12:52:22 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (Clever tagline can only be seen on the other internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: All

I have a question - WHO gets the $$ IF she pays? And, who usually gets the money when people are fined in other cases??


37 posted on 11/17/2009 1:26:36 PM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: SvenMagnussen

Thanks for your humorous post. I needed a smile today.


108 posted on 11/18/2009 5:00:00 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson