Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic; Right Man; GodGunsGuts; metmom

Huh?

Why is it liberals continue to demand all these rules be met that they don’t intend to keep themselves?

Peer review...then “measurable, replicable”, etc. but when it’s pointed out no other theory like multiverse theory or string theory be required to meet these standards, we see endless excuse-making and hand waving and back-peddaling.

And now we see demands for...

“empirically verified” and “metrics” ???

Where are the...ummmm “empirically verified metrics” for life oozing out of muck all by itself? Let alone all life supposedly coming from this single-celled first organism into all the complex life-forms we know today.


37 posted on 11/17/2009 2:58:08 PM PST by tpanther (Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: tpanther; tacticalogic; Right Man; GodGunsGuts; metmom
And now we see demands for...

“empirically verified” and “metrics” ???

GGG made that claim in an earlier post. See his phrasing.

38 posted on 11/17/2009 3:03:56 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: tpanther
No one demanded it. It was freely submitted that the evidence exists. I simply asked what the metrics were.

Do you think you can simply make up claims that you have empirically verified evidence for things that there are no empirical metrics to even measure by and nobody should be able to question it?

39 posted on 11/17/2009 3:04:53 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson