I think you and Kozak should get together and maybe refine your evolution explanations. Evolution descriptions [just-so stories] are as lacking as those pictures saying that a led to b led to c, d, and finally e.
The argument for irreducile complexity has never been truly addressed by these stories in that to change from one kind to the other with lots of ‘beneficial’ mutations the bacteria or organ would first have to be rendered completely useless before enough good changes happened to make it more highly functional.
“The argument for irreducile complexity has never been truly addressed.”
Only in your mind.
The argument for irreducible complexity does not need to be addressed or explained using evolutionary thinking....it stands on it own or it does not.
Outside the ICR echo chamber...it does not.