[ElectricStrawberry]

Yes, a book of stories, including the brief mention of a big vegetarian animal with a big tail.

Never not once in the history of books has there ever been embellishment of any kind on any page.....ever.

I notice the book also mentions dragons multiple times. That does not mean that dragons ever actually existed.

Changing the subject to something else does not make a large vegetarian big-tailed animal a dinosaur.

[BrandtMichaels]

Projecting [a big vegetarian animal] a little bit are we?! I don’t recall any mention of them being vegetarians only. Maybe it would be too close to home for you if they are meat-eaters

So all the accounts from history about dragons are just make-believe too [ in your no-so-humble opinion anyways]?

Wonder if, after several centuries pass, the historians will look upon evolution as make believe fairy tales too. That would be poetic justice w/ a little irony.

[BrandtMichaels]

Projecting [a big vegetarian animal] a little bit are we?! I don’t recall any mention of them being vegetarians only. Maybe it would be too close to home for you if they are meat-eaters

So all the accounts from history about dragons are just make-believe too [ in your no-so-humble opinion anyways]?

Wonder if, after several centuries pass, the historians will look upon evolution as make believe fairy tales too. That would be poetic justice w/ a little irony.

[BrandtMichaels]

Projecting [a big vegetarian animal] a little bit are we?! I don’t recall any mention of them being vegetarians only. Maybe it would be too close to home for you if they are meat-eaters

So all the accounts from history about dragons are just make-believe too [ in your no-so-humble opinion anyways]?

Wonder if, after several centuries pass, the historians will look upon evolution as make believe fairy tales too. That would be poetic justice w/ a little irony.

[metmom]

Yes, a book of stories, including the brief mention of a big vegetarian animal with a big tail.

Glad you recognize Darwin's work as a book of stories. Which book is it that mentions big, vegetarian animals with big tails?

Seems to me that there isn't really a lack of evidence about what could be dinosaurs; just a lack of evidence that evos are willing to consider, and consider valid.

And the catch is, is anything that is problematic for the ToE is dismissed off hand; it's just written of as not *real* evidence.

Nothing will ever be found to disprove the ToE in evos eyes, because nothing will ever be allowed that will disprove it.

Very convenient.