Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ElectricStrawberry
It’s not “evos”....it’s molecular biologists and biochemists that took a look at the evidence presented, laughed about it, then produced a function of a sub-structure of the claimed irreducible structures. You know...real scientists doing real science.

You mean scientists that are supposedly considered intelligent designing experiments to demonstrate that they can assemble something complex?

And in what way does this invalidate the concept of an intelligent designer designing something?

Science has NOT disproved that there was intelligence or design behind the order and complexity that we see in the universe.

It has not disproved the creation account in the Bible.

The naturalistic materialistic philosophy argues against it, but that is not disproving it either.

105 posted on 11/18/2009 7:40:09 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
You mean scientists that are supposedly considered intelligent designing experiments to demonstrate that they can assemble something complex?

You claiming "scientists" are the Creationist "God"? No, I mean scientists finding function where IC/ID says there can be no function....you know, what I said not what you want to think I said. Strawmen abound!

And in what way does this invalidate the concept of an intelligent designer designing something?

It does not because that was not what was claimed. There is no need to scientifically invalidate something that has not been scientifically validated....claiming "God did it" does not scientifically validate that "God did it" in order for someone else to waste their time in generating science that says that "God did not do it." Don't have to disprove that which is not proven.

Science has NOT disproved that there was intelligence or design behind the order and complexity that we see in the universe

That claim was not made. Science has disproved the evidence provided for irreducible complexity. Strawmen abound!!

It has not disproved the creation account in the Bible.

It has not and that claim has not been made. Science has disproved the twisting of science used to attempt to prove the account of creation in the Bible, nothing more.

109 posted on 11/18/2009 8:31:56 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (Didja know that Man walked with 100+ species of large meat eating dinos within the last 4,351 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson