Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rufus2007

I think Sarah’s explanation was obvious and she sort of explained this at the time. It was insulting to ask her what newspapers she reads, as if she didn’t read any. But Sarah underestimated the press’s ability to be absurd. As if she never reads a newspaper.


5 posted on 11/16/2009 2:26:15 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Williams

If Sarah thought she was going to get a fair interview from Couric, she was living in fantasyland.


14 posted on 11/16/2009 3:11:18 PM PST by WillT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Williams

They wanted to criticize Sarah for not reading the Wash Post, N.Y. Times, Time, Newsweek, etc. If she said she reads the Anchorage paper only, for example, they would criticize her for her limited reading. USA Today would not be intellectual or sophisticated enough to suit Katie. Wall Street Journal would be too conservative and too focused on the GOP stereotype of favoring the wealthy, etc. etc.


17 posted on 11/16/2009 5:14:19 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson