It is the sex positive agenda's absolute rejection of abstinence on human sexual responses. If it feels good do it. Experiment.
They consider abstinence UNHEALTHY because it is a supression of sexual desires.
Abstinence blocks the transmission of disease (and pregnancy) every time it's applied.
Instead the establishment's attitude is "everybody does it" and has now proceeded to tell girls that there is no stigma in getting HPV, "everybody catches THAT one now...".
I was shocked when I came across this idea. We have come from the belief that sex is something powerful that must be restrained to sex is a right that shouldn't be contained.
I have heard that the reason Republicans are considered "anti-woman" is because of the conservative value of sex being within marriage. I believe the quote was "it only makes sense if they [Republicans] are against women having orgasms."
And, we know from the promotion of condoms in Africa and the UK. Only Uganda, which has promoted abstinence and monogamy, has seen a significant drop in AIDS in the continent.
Condoms have done nothing to slow the AIDS epidemic in Africa. Teen STDs and abortion are at an all-time high in the UK as the government continues to use condoms as a primary strategy in public schools to stop teen STDs.
The real question is, are liberals are stupid enough to believe condoms can solve the problem or do they know it won't and want to take advantage of the problems caused by the spread of STDs?