"From where we sit, it seems that the allegation "Dr. Carlin offered a report poking holes in the science underlying the theory of manmade global warming. His superior ... complained the paper did "not help the legal or policy case" for Team Obama's decision to regulate carbon, told him to "move on to other issues," and forbade him from discussing it outside the office" fits the above definitions of academic dishonesty and scientific misconduct. Furthermore, scientific misconduct is in fact cause for temporary or even permanent debarment from receiving Federal funds (if performed, for example, by a professor at a university), and this underscores just how serious this allegation is. The people of the United States have a right to know whether the Environmental Protection Agency exists to protect them from genuine pollutants, or whether it has become a front for the advancement of an agenda to enrich campaign contribution bundlers for Team Obama."
Please feel free to copy (don't link, it uses my bandwidth) and circulate the following:
