Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators push plan to subsidize lost hours
The Hill ^ | 11/16/2009 | Walter Alarkon

Posted on 11/16/2009 3:45:30 AM PST by markomalley

Senate Democrats crafting a job creation bill are considering a proposal to give money to workers who cut their hours in order to avoid layoffs.

A bill sponsored by Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) would give unemployment compensation to employees who accept a reduced work schedule to allow their companies to avert layoffs or to hire more employees. Reed's proposal for work-sharing was mentioned during the Senate Democrats' lunch Tuesday, when Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) announced that an initiative focusing on jobs would soon be a priority, Reed's office said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: france
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: ought-six
“What is this? France?” Not even France is as bad as what we have become.
The government is now meddling with the distorted job market they have concocted with job rules, unemployment insurance, SS, Medicaid, importing workers, mimnimum wage ...

We have layer upon layer of meddling, distortion, bad incentives, unintended consequences. Instead of admitting that they have screwed up, they keep trying to fix the mess they have made with repeated applications of stupidity . Socialist Europe has constant rates of 25% and higher unemployment. This is the model that our own Socialists are striving for - smothering job creating private enterprise with more layers of government garbage.

21 posted on 11/16/2009 5:10:25 AM PST by gorilla_warrior (Metrosexual hairless RINOs for hopey-changey bipartisan-ness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NEPA
In PA, it’s called “partials”. Probably every state already does this. If you’re not working full time you can get reduced unemployment compensation under certain conditions.

This does not under any circumstance seem to be a good idea to me. Employers typically provide some sort of fringe package to employees. The cost of that fringe package does not typically change significantly with the amount of pay. So the lower the amount of pay, the higher percentage fringe takes up.

For example,

Employers know this: that's why they use overtime rather than new hires.

It would be nice if politicians could figure out basic math like that.

22 posted on 11/16/2009 5:23:57 AM PST by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

this is a sop to the government unions, since they’re the ones who predominantly would up with ‘furlough’ days, and especially california (big electoral votes) who has the worst forlough days


23 posted on 11/16/2009 5:35:23 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

I should have made millions. Where is my money?


24 posted on 11/16/2009 5:37:32 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Adder
Arkansas does it. It is part of unemployment benefits. You are only eligible if you fall below 80% of your regular take home pay. In other words, if you are cut back to a 32 hour week from a 40 hour week you don't qualify. But if you fall below that 32 hours you get a partial unemployment check. Usually bringing you up to the 80% of your pay. I don't think it is a bad idea at all. The company pays into unemployment insurance so their employees should receive the benefits. This is especially true for companies like mine that have a NO Layoff policy.
25 posted on 11/16/2009 5:43:09 AM PST by Angry_White_Man_Syndrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Angry_White_Man_Syndrome

Well, there have been a lot of people who have had to cut wages and still work the same hours..what about them?

When does this all end?

The company doesn’t have a layoff policy, I am guessing, because the State has one so they just pay their money and are done with it.

[Visualize your healthcare being done that way....]


26 posted on 11/16/2009 5:58:07 AM PST by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
...but what about those who never had a job, who don’t want a job, can’t spell job. What about those needy Americans, we must make an exception, to send them some of Odumbo’s stash.......

And they should be the first to get it. They are the neediest.

If Reed's bill is passed wouldn't all employers cut employee hours and let the government pick up the tab? Would that be one of those "unintended consequences" the Democrats are so famous for?

27 posted on 11/16/2009 6:00:25 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
If Reed's bill is passed wouldn't all employers cut employee hours

..no, just union members

28 posted on 11/16/2009 6:05:16 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

ever hear of the NYC rubberroom?...some put it as high as 700 teachers....from an article:

NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing?

No Related Post
When a student acts up in class, the teacher usually sends them to the Principal’s office. But what happens to a New York City teacher or school administrator when they are accused of misconduct? They get sent to so-called “rubber rooms” during the investigation. The time they spend waiting there could be weeks, months or even years.

The 700 or so teachers can practice yoga, work on their novels, paint portraits of their colleagues — pretty much anything but school work. They have summer vacation just like their classroom colleagues and enjoy weekends and holidays through the school year.

Sounds like a holiday, but to many teachers waiting and facing accusations it’s not.

“Most people in that room are depressed,” said Jennifer Saunders, a high school teacher who was in a reassignment center from 2005 to 2008.

The New York City re-assignment centers have existed since the 1990s, but according to the Associated Press, “the number of employees assigned to them has ballooned since Bloomberg won more control over the schools in 2002.”

Because teacher’s union contracts make it difficult to fire them, teachers waiting in the rubber room collect their full salaries which, according to the Department of Education, ends up costing taxpayers $65 million a year.

It’s a battle between the city and the teacher’s unions, students and teachers. And who knows how things will turn out.


29 posted on 11/16/2009 6:15:08 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

This is already the case in a handful of notoriously pro-union states, most notably Michigan. If your hours get cut from 40 to 35 you can file an unemployment claim for those 5 hrs. It’s a major reason that the cost of their Workers Comp is so high (and correspondingly, their unemployment rate)


30 posted on 11/16/2009 6:17:36 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Not even France is as bad as what we have become.

Obviously you’ve never tried to do business in France.
I think they gave up on the concept of work about the time the last guillotine shut down.


31 posted on 11/16/2009 6:19:00 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Bttt


32 posted on 11/16/2009 6:36:43 AM PST by Professional Engineer (Will Algore give me carbon credits for using treehuggers as home heating fuel? ~~ Galt/Reardon 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Sounds like the UAW and their Job Banks. A “laid Off” union member gets put into a Job Bank where they draw 85% - 90% of their regular wages and keep their benefits. If they get an offer for a job in another locale they can either take it or turn it down and stay in the Job Bank. Of course, it is the employer who pays for this and by necessity they pass it on in their prices to us. As always, we are at the end of the line when it comes to paying.


33 posted on 11/16/2009 6:38:32 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

More giveaways on the way.


34 posted on 11/16/2009 7:39:06 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (I am tired of being PC. It's time for torches, pitchforks, tar, feathers and GUNS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Don't forget State unemployment comp is only temporary, it's the Feds that keep extending it.

It's sometimes worth it to a company to keep a person part time temporarily while things are slow. The alternative is to lose the employee and have to retrain a new hire later on.

35 posted on 11/16/2009 7:52:26 AM PST by NEPA (Give me liberty, not debt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Since the employers pay unemployment and any reduction in hours are a temporary remedy during hard times, this has to have an alterior motive.
Let’s see, since all the big busineeses are finding increased productivity with less workers, is this the Dums new Socialist workers bill. How much you want to bet that all of the unemployed are going to be paid by their former employers IF the companies don’t rehire them.
That way the Fed can reduce the unemployment #S and not be hindered by the expiration of benefits


36 posted on 11/16/2009 8:17:23 AM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Then what is the use of a company that does not layoff workers paying into unemployment? It makes little economic sense to cut workers pay in manufacturing when demand is down. It does make sense to cut hours worked because then savings in electrical costs can be realized. These people also saw there pay cut to 80% of their normal.


37 posted on 11/16/2009 9:06:43 AM PST by Angry_White_Man_Syndrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“This sure sounds like a stupid idea to me. Paying people not to work.Yeah that will get us out of debt.”

How about if the Bamtard issues an executive order defining all those people as farmers, and we then pay them not to grow crops?


38 posted on 11/16/2009 9:58:46 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7

I’m sorry to say this clown is one of my senators; the other is even worse...


39 posted on 11/16/2009 11:34:35 AM PST by bt_dooftlook (ACORN = Another Communist-Overrun Rats-Nest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson