[FrankR]

"So you would be okay, at least to the extent of not prosecuting, i.e. legalizing, any 17-year-old engaging and exhibiting even if she wasn't against gay marriage? "

Well, it's turned into a witch hunt by mccain and the gay lobby, so that's really what it's all about at this point.

I think she's 21 or 22 now, and if she was 17 then the statute of limitations might have even expired, I don't know. (NOW REMEMBER I SAID "I DON'T KNOW" BEFORE YOU LAUNCH INTO MY IGNORANCE OF THE STATUTES).

It would be very hard to find too many 17 year olds in the past 20 years who had NOT had sex.

So to answer your question, YES, I would be okay with it so long as it was consensual and no children resulted from the union.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

Congratulations, you are consistent.

Should anyone be prosecuted if she had been 16?...