Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: achilles2000

You still aren’t thinking.

If SS has been running a surplus since its inception, but there’s nothing but IOUs in the piggy bank...then OBVIOUSLY it’s quite a bit more than a scam to transfer wealth from youngsters to old people, isn’t it??!?!

Think some more.


41 posted on 11/16/2009 4:24:36 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre

No. All “surplus” means is that one revenue stream (payroll taxes) was once enough to pay retirees receiving SS and Medicare and to provide revenue for other government boondoggles. Now the payroll tax is insufficient, so now general revenues and deficit spending are needed to transfer money to retires.

SS was always a wealth transfer scheme. It was never “insurance” or actuarially based. This was pointed out when it was adopted, and there is a vast conservative literature pointing out that how words and phrases like “trust fund”, “surplus”, “old age insurance” are just cynical misuses of words to mislead the public.

SS is not “insurance”, there is no “trust fund” (the IOUs aren’t backed by anything other than a willingness to tax the daylights out of working people for the benefit of geezers, which means that it is no different from any other statutory income transfer program.), and nobody has an “account”.


46 posted on 11/16/2009 7:34:29 PM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson