As far as I know, she never said: "I support the gay attack on Prejean."
On the other hand, when the gay/MSM alliance digs through Prejean's personal life and finds private, never intended to be publicized material, and then uses it to blackmail Prejean into stopping her public speaking against gay marriage, Maggie takes the position that the blackmail is based on a "discovery" of Prejeans supposed "immorality," rather than blackmailing her on her MORAL privacy.
SO: since a massive political effort is being made to silence Prejean, and since Maggie is making a direct argument to people she presumes will reject Prejean if she is associated with immorality, I would say that Maggie is indeed supporting and enabling the silencing of Prejean, which is exactly the intended goal of the gay/MSM alliance.
As to why Maggie would do this, she seems to feel fully justified in taking the position that conservatives must be "perfect or bust." In response, the gay/MSM alliance are laughing their butts off, and scratching the enormous political focusing power of Carrie Prejean off of their to-do list, while raising a champagne toast in thanks to Maggie for her moral cleansing efforts.
It’s hard to ignore the dichotomy between the image of a Christian conservative that Prejean has tried to present and the discovery of multiple tapes of her - according to someone here - masturbating.
Now for those who think these tapes are just fine then I’d have to go to Prejean herself who apparently dropped a lawsuit when she learned they had been discovered.
Too bad she did it - to lose her forum, her image, over something so stupid.
However, why anyone would assume this has anything really to do with whether or not we should have gay marriage - well the left will use it to the max, as they always will, despite it being unrelated. Alinksky’s Rules for thee, not me. Too bad she provided the ammunition.