"We're media Leftists! We don't need no steenking logic or empirical evidence to support this theory. "
How exactly does "they suffered, he listened" equal "he snapped"? Where is the logic, or the empirical evidence to support this theory? How many other psychiatrists have treated a particular group of Americans with psychological trauma and then gone out and murdered as many of them as he could? How can these filthy, lying liberal vermin even try to put forward such idiocy? I guess they feel their media audience are a bunch of idiots, and they probably are.
But just you watch, the stinking lawyers who will vigorously defend this Islamic devil with put forth the theory that he had such "compassion" for our suffering combat veterans that he just wanted to end their suffering. They will call it a sort of "compassionate mercy killing spree" or some such nonsense. Of course they will argue that this islamic terrorist was mentally ill as well, but underneath it all he was just a compassionate muslim who tried to end his patients' suffering by killing them. What the Army ought to do is run this trial through with all the swiftness they can muster, and then publicly hang this worthless, murderous dog. And let the message be clear, any more koranic worshipping dogs caught in acts of terror will be publicly hung by the neck until dead.
"We're media Leftists! We don't need no steenking logic or empirical evidence to support this theory. "
There is no logic, no theory, no evidence. Since it has become manifestly obvious that the government now makes it up as they go along, the whorehouse media has decided it has been given permission to do the same, as long as it is in the service of the state.
Klein and Thomas, and others, apparently have felt free to simply lie through their teeth and fabricate in the pages of their respective rags, and they no longer even make a pretense of factuality or objectivity.
Such is life under the rule of a regime which communicates to its subjects through the Ministry of Information.