Yeah, right! Oh, gosh, I’d just love to see your “rebuttal.”
I think you need to work on your reading comprehension skills. What I “conceded” is that ID is not “scientific” according to the Popper definition of what is “scientific.” But according to that definition, neither is the current explanation for the origin of life. Nor is SETI.
Go ahead, repeat once again that ID is not scientific. The more you repeat it, the more sure you can be that it is true.
As I said before, with Christians like you, who needs athiests? What is sad is that the ignorance you promote is keeping many others from becoming Christians.
I have never made any claims aboiut SETI. They do at least, however, have a stated hypothesis and they are trying to test it. What is ID's hypothesis and what are you doing to test it?