[Publius]

This is what happened when this hit piece on Rand was posted the first time.

[Clinging Bitterly]

Yeah - I think a lot of so-cons feel compelled to throw mud on her because of her atheism and /or her sexual values. But to me that's one of very few conflicts with the broader vision. Certainly she she never suggested anyone should abandon whatever they perceive as virtuous in their own manner of conducting their affairs. She just said we don't need government to force us to live according to our ideals or anyone else's. And she was right about that.

[stylin_geek]

These articles makes me laugh. All of the Rand detractors will not admit that Rand influenced them enough to have an opinion.

Nevermind the minor fact that if Rand is so wrong and inconsequential, why does she still bring out such strong emotion and opinion?