[Behemoth the Cat]

"But evos constantly dodge the question of where the first one came from."

Sure, to avoid confusing two separate matters. Natural selection (of existing live organisms) is one thing, the origin of life is another. Now, what do you want to discuss, the mechanism of evolution, or the origins of life?

[GodGunsGuts]

LOL! Let's see, if the evos can't explain the origin of life, then it's not part of evolution. But if they ever were able to explain the origin of life via naturalistic processess, then it would be part of evolution. Typical evo logic.

[BrandtMichaels]

Well metmom could generously grant you the one living cell and you’d still have nothing intelligible to discuss.

Or even more generously grant you the amoeba. Now please explain how it ‘re-programs itself’ into another genus. How does it create the more complex organs and limbs needed?

I’ll go get the popcorn and hurry right back.

[metmom]

Where did the first cell come from?

From what did IT evolve?

The questions are not two separate issues, as evos like to present. The chemical reactions that allegedly gave rise to the first life are all part of one continuum.

At what point did life first become life? Or did it just pop into existence and then we pick up the ToE from there?

[tpanther]

"But evos constantly dodge the question of where the first one came from."

Sure, to avoid confusing two separate matters. Natural selection (of existing live organisms) is one thing, the origin of life is another. Now, what do you want to discuss, the mechanism of evolution, or the origins of life?

One need not be confused...only the liberal evolutionists seem to get confused. Are you seriously suggesting you're not intelligent enough to discuss a connection between the two?